Discover your dream Career
For Recruiters

GUEST COMMENT: I am merely a headhunter, but I believe I have solved the financial crisis

Wouldn't it be great if...

-The national debt was repaid

- The interest and capital repayments on the national debt were now spent on lowering taxes and raising public spending instead

- The private sector expanded and employed more people

- The unemployment numbers reduced and so did the social security bill

- The public finances were in balance

- The banks did what the public consider to be a fair share of fixing the economy and the banks even got a PR win for doing so.

And all this happened in say, about eighteen months. Yes, that would indeed be great.

Well, here's an idea. Raise the minimum valuation for a CDO portfolio to above zero.

That's it really.

What do you mean you don't get it? Oh, you want me to show the working out. OK, here it is:

CDO portfolios are hard to value. I mean, like, really hard. Just in case they turn out to be as toxic as everyone thought they were, banks are obliged under capital adequacy regulations to stash a load of money aside. All sensible stuff you might say. However, banks have been overly prudent and valued their CDOs portfolios at zero.

This is beneficial to the banks in two ways. One, it might be accurate and they don't want further losses to be realised in the future if they can possibly help it. Secondly, even if zero is not an accurate valuation, there's no harm in keeping capital off the books right now, otherwise they'd only have to go and lend it and/or pay tax on it. And let's face it, the banks don't fancy lending more than they have to in this market - the borrowers are looking less than triple A rated right now. And paying taxes is a mug's game, as any banker knows.

Why don't we just say this: We know your portfolios are not actually worthless. We could say that CDO portfolios new floor value is erm [*plucks figure from thin air*] 15% of par value. We could do this by just making it a rule. We could go further and say that this rule will only be in place for one tax cycle, the time it will take for the vast majority of banks to complete at least one tax return.

Banks will then have to release some cash from being stashed aside under capital adequacy regulations and bring it back on to the books, where it will available for the Chancellor to take a big swipe at it. If the banks don't want the Chancellor to have some, they can always put it to work by normalising credit conditions for the private sector. In reality it will be a mix of the two and the Chancellor will end up with a healthier private sector to tax, so the result will be the same anyway.

The Chancellor will then have a nice chunk of tax from the bank. There will be a healthier private sector paying corporate tax, and more employees to paying income tax. There will also be less unemployment benefit to pay.

Banks will be able to say that they've helped the economy out when all they've really done is revalue their portfolios ahead of time, thereby bringing forward taxes they would have paid in the future.

Job done.

So where did I get 15% of par value from? Actually, I confess, I am a bit of a geek when it comes to maths, and despite being a City Headhunter, can hold my own in a conversation with a quant. It's public knowledge that even in 2008, CDO portfolios were still realising 25% of par and that's when they were considered really toxic. I also know that everything is only worth what you can sell it for, and there aren't many buyers for CDO portfolios right now, so I am not suggesting anything actually gets sold. However it's a bit naughty for banks to use capital adequacy regs to suppress revenues and profits and behave oh-so-piously, when the economy could do with some pragmatism and honesty. Having discussed the numbers above with people who are Quants, 15% of par is a figure that it would be really hard for banks to kick up a fuss about.

And 15% of the CDO market is a really big number - big enough for us to do what we need to do with the economy.

Yours in hope,

Johnny Walker

Magnus Walker & Partners

www.magnuswalker.com

author-card-avatar
AUTHORJohnny Walker Insider Comment
  • bl
    blabla
    4 November 2011

    nero has got my point -opinions are well accepted but this is something that the leader website in the Finance sector (aren't you guys??) should not go after and certainly not publlish....my opinion.....then of course it drives a lot readers and proabably it is what you want but in the long run it does not pay..my opinion.....

  • Jo
    Johnny Warbler
    3 November 2011

    I feel like my reputation has been tarnished even by reading this article, nevermind those who have published or wrote it!

  • si
    sincerelyhunting
    3 November 2011

    Oh Mr Wally ...I mean Mr Walker , that is not helpful at all . As a head-hunter with my own firm and an excellent reputation why do buffoons like you open your mouths spilling drivel and pointless garbage publicly that then leads to the onslaught of more verbal abuse on the industry. Please keep your thoughts to yourself.Head-hunters are meant to be discreet , trustworthy and not self promoting. you must be very insecure to try such an abortive attempt of a PR campaign for your firm .

  • Si
    Sickened
    3 November 2011

    This article is just embarrasing for everyone involved. I can't understand why this guy would want this published.

  • Ex
    Ex-Sarah Fan due to this artic
    3 November 2011

    @Sarah I sent a comment outlining my analysis into the speakers background and company. Why in the name of "free speech" did you not publish my comments? All I did was state fact about the writer's company and office, to give readers a greater awareness of his background and the correct level of 'credibility'.

Sign up to Morning Coffee!

Coffee mug

The essential daily roundup of news and analysis read by everyone from senior bankers and traders to new recruits.

Sign up to Morning Coffee!

Coffee mug

The essential daily roundup of news and analysis read by everyone from senior bankers and traders to new recruits.