Discover your dream Career
For Recruiters

This is how many job cuts JPMorgan, UBS, Credit Suisse and RBS will probably need to make in the second half

Unless there's a miraculous recovery in revenues in the next few weeks, banks will almost certainly need to make more redundancies in the second half.

This sad reality comes after a rush of continued hiring in London over the past year. As Financial News points out today, Merrill Lynch International added 1,207 FSA-approved people between July 2010 and June 2011, RBC added around 94 people; Jefferies added around 62.

However, while headcount has increased, revenues haven't. Cost revenue ratios rose substantially at most banks in the first half.

Based on this increase, and assuming banks would like to achieve a cost/revenue ratio more like the first half of 2010, we've looked at how many jobs some of them would need to cut. The result is not pretty.

RBS Global Banking and Markets

Total cost ratio in Global Banking and Markets in the first half of 2011: 60%

Total cost ratio in Global Banking and Markets in the first half of 2010: 49%

Revenues in the first half: 3.9bn

Cost savings necessary to return to a 49% cost ratio: 423m.

Staff reductions necessary to achieve a 49% cost ratio (based on staff costs at 62% of the total and first half compensation of 77k per employee): 3,469

Staff reductions announced so far: None specifically, although John Hourican told the Financial Times he might make up to 2,000 people redundant in GBM. The bank has also indicated that it would be happy with a 55% cost income ratio - suggesting more like 1,600 people could lose their jobs (assuming the cost cutting isn't borne entirely by staff reductions).

UBS Investment Bank

Total cost ratio in the investment bank in the first half of 2011: 80%

Total cost ratio in the investment bank in the first half of 2010: 69%

Revenues in the first half: CHF6.2bn

Cost savings necessary to return to a 69% cost ratio: CHF675m.

Staff reductions necessary to achieve a 69% cost ratio (based on staff costs at 79% of the total and first half compensation of CHF191k per employee): 2,808

Staff reductions announced so far: None really, although 5,000 have been bandied about across the bank.

JPMorgan Investment Bank

Total cost ratio in the investment bank in the first half of 2011: 63%

Total cost ratio in the investment bank in the first half of 2010: 58%

Revenues in the first half: $24bn

Cost savings necessary to return to a 58% cost ratio: $1.2bn.

Staff reductions necessary to achieve a 58% cost ratio (based on staff costs at 48% of the total and first half compensation of $211k per employee): 2,707

Staff reductions announced so far: None, publicly.

Credit Suisse Investment Bank

Total cost ratio in the investment bank in the first half of 2011: 80%

Total cost ratio in the investment bank in the first half of 2010: 73%

Revenues in the first half: CHF7.8bn

Cost savings necessary to return to a 73% cost ratio: CHF542m.

Staff reductions necessary to achieve a 73% cost ratio (based on staff costs at 62% of the total and first half compensation of CHF181k per employee): 1,869.

Staff reductions announced so far: 2,000 across the bank, with 'a few hundred' falling in investment banking.

The good news is that based on cost ratios, some banks won't need to make many more cost cuts. BarCap's cost ratio in the first half of 2011 (65%) was below its cost ratio for the first half of 2010 (66%). Using the methodology above Goldman needs to make 544 redundancies to replicate 2010 margins, but has announced that it will be cutting 1,000 people already.

author-card-avatar
AUTHORSarah Butcher Global Editor
  • Ja
    Jane
    1 September 2011

    Just been made redundant today jp Morgan once again moving jobs to Mumbai .

  • St
    Steve
    24 August 2011

    What about Goldmans and Morgan stanley- how are they safe? the crisis is global. Not even the almighty US are safe right? - or are they?

  • Ja
    Jack
    24 August 2011

    Is it true that JPM will be buying Bank of America Merrill Lynch?- are they nuts? they have such a great reputation, better than GS! how they can they even consider this?

  • Kl
    Kloot
    22 August 2011

    Well revenue didn't increase when they added all those people so why not?

  • Hi
    Hi5
    22 August 2011

    Wow, such a simple assumption that revenue would not fall, even after culling so many people!

Sign up to Morning Coffee!

Coffee mug

The essential daily roundup of news and analysis read by everyone from senior bankers and traders to new recruits.

Sign up to Morning Coffee!

Coffee mug

The essential daily roundup of news and analysis read by everyone from senior bankers and traders to new recruits.