Discover your dream Career
For Recruiters

"I spent 20 years in banking. A £500k tax bill destroyed my life"

Young people in financial services jobs are complaining about high taxes in London. I absolutely sympathise, but I also caution anyone who thinks taxes can be avoided - even legally. I am part of a generation of London bankers who were wronged by HMRC, and it has financially destroyed me.

Get Morning Coffee  in your inbox. Sign up here.

I spent 20 years working in the markets in London. I was successful and worth millions. I had a wife, four children, a house in Essex with a pool and a tennis court. 

Around 2008, the bank I worked for suggested a legal tax avoidance scheme involving an employee benefit trust. These kinds of schemes were common at the top - 2,000 London bankers at JPMorgan were using them. They enabled individuals to avoid paying tax on bonuses by handing bonus money to an offshore trust, which then returned the money in the form of a loan.

I was suspicious, but everyone was doing it and when I asked my personal financial advisor he assured me that it was legitimate.  At the time, the schemes were widely used and broadly understood to be acceptable.

Then, in 2013, the British government passed something called the General Anti-Abuse Rule as part of the 2013 Finance Act. Coupled with previous rulings from 2004 and the disguised remuneration rules of 2011, this enabled the government to declare tax avoidance schemes retrospectively impermissible and to demand payment of tax that it considered due.

It came at a difficult time of my life. My wife left me and I had gone through a difficult divorce, but I still had money in the bank. And then - overnight - I received a retrospective tax demand for hundreds of thousands of pounds.

I was financially wiped out. For a while, it felt like my whole life had been destroyed. I wasn't alone in using these schemes, which were also popular with lower earners like nurses and contractors. There have been multiple suicides as a result. 

Everyone in the UK is now familiar with the Post Office scandal, but this is a scandal that no one discusses. The presumption is that we did something wrong, but we didn't. The government changed the rules overnight; you can't go up against HMRC.

After my divorce, I was unable to pay the bill. HMRC started sending me aggressive letters demanding that I pay and began imposing punitive fines. It nearly killed me; I could easily have taken my own life, too. In 2015, though, I came to a repayment agreement with them. I've paid back £500k already and when I factor in fines and legal fees, the taxation on my earnings from the period covered by the trust has reached 80%. 

I am now in my 60s, and I am still paying the bill off.

This is what tax injustice really looks like.

Tony Patrick is a pseudonym

Have a confidential story, tip, or comment you’d like to share? Contact: +44 7537 182250 (SMS, Whatsapp or voicemail). Telegram: @SarahButcher. Signal: sarahbutcher.22  Click here to fill in our anonymous form, or email editortips@efinancialcareers.com. 

Bear with us if you leave a comment at the bottom of this article: comments are moderated intermittently by human beings. Sometimes these humans might be asleep, or away from their desks, so it may take a while for your comment to appear. You must take sole responsibility for comments you post on this site. We will take reasonable steps to weed out anything that we consider to be offensive or inappropriate.

author-card-avatar
AUTHORTony Patrick Insider Comment
  • Bl
    Blue Horseshoe
    3 December 2025
    " this enabled the government to declare a tax avoidance schemes retrospectively impermissible and to demand payment of tax that it considered due." The government should not be able to change the law retrospectively. Imagine the Rachel Reeves raising basic income tax to 45% today and then backdating it 20 years !!! No one was doing anything wrong at the time. It only became wrong retrospectively. It comfortably passed the "sniff" test and it was only by making it illegal retrospectively that they could address the issue. If this was done with income tax there would be huge outcry about it being unfair. Because it was a tax avoidance scheme it did not cost the government votes to attack it.
  • Sk
    Skitter7
    3 December 2025
    As I think GK Chesterton once said, 'No matter how many people are doing something wrong, it won't make it right'. Your bonus was a part of your earnings, and just because some charlatan lawyers came up with a ruse that was not specifically covered by legislation to aggressively avoid (evade) tax, if everyone had bothered to apply the 'sniff' test, I think they would have picked up a strong whiff of something pretty unsavoury.
  • Lo
    LordNelson
    3 December 2025
    Sympathize a bit as I was in an EBT, but all users were offered the HMRC Settlement Opportunity which at the time meant paying the tax and NI that should have been paid if the moneys had been paid as normal earnings, in which case no worse off. You are a grown up, you took the risk of going into the EBT which sorry was at the time regarded as aggressive tax planning at the very least, and then HMRC made it very clear they regarded it as avoidance , so not taking the settlement opportunity - again your choice?

Sign up to Morning Coffee!

Coffee mug

The essential daily roundup of news and analysis read by everyone from senior bankers and traders to new recruits.

Sign up to Morning Coffee!

Coffee mug

The essential daily roundup of news and analysis read by everyone from senior bankers and traders to new recruits.