Discover your dream Career
For Recruiters

"I'm a hedge fund analyst and my life sucks"

I am an analyst in a hedge fund. And I am my portfolio managers' bitch.

I am not the only one. I've worked in hedge funds for many years now (I used to work in a bank) and I've come to the realization that patience is not a virtue that most people in the industry possess. Everybody wants everything, immediately. Especially portfolio managers (PMs).

Ok, so some PMs are great to work for. The rest? Not so much. They all want everything right away, it's just some are more understanding than others. But the worst expect you to track down some mundane piece of information, even if it doesn't exist.

The standard task delegated to the subservient analyst is the mission to find out why XYZ stock is down.  I'm not talking about when it's down 5% while the rest of the market is up. That's actually important and I don't need to be asked to search for that. No, I'm referring to when the PM is in a bad mood and wants to know why the stock is down 1.5%, while the rest of the market is down 1%.

If you've ever been on the buy side, you've probably experienced this and know how stupid of a question this is. There could be a million reason why a stock is slightly under-performing. But you can't tell your PM it's stupid. At least, not immediately. So instead, you need to waste time searching for an answer. Searching for one you know you won't find.

The first step is checking the news to see if there was any important information that could cause the stock to be down 50bps more than the rest of the market. If you can't find any news, then you need to see if there were any sell side reports published in the morning. The report couldn't have been that negative if the stock is only down 50bps relative to the market, so maybe it was mildly negative? If there's nothing there, the next check is with the trader and calling some sell-side analysts to see if they've heard anything. After that, you need to look at read-throughs from companies related to the one you're looking at.

Finally, after all that searching and wasting 30 minutes of your life that could have been spent doing something (literally anything) more productive, you can then tell your PM that it was a stupid question. And the best way to do that is by telling him/her that there are more sellers than buyers in the market.

From a factual standpoint, this statement is 100% correct. Due to the laws of supply and demand, a share price can't go down when there are more buyers than sellers. Hopefully, your PM will note the ridiculousness of the question by the ridiculousness of the response. If not, maybe it's time to find a new PM, or wait where you are until you get asked the same thing the next day.

Have a confidential story, tip, or comment you’d like to share? Contact: sbutcher@efinancialcareers.com

Bear with us if you leave a comment at the bottom of this article: all our comments are moderated by human beings. Sometimes these humans might be asleep, or away from their desks, so it may take a while for your comment to appear. Eventually it will – unless it’s offensive or libelous (in which case it won’t.)

Margin of Saving was created by an analyst at a multi-billion dollar hedge fund to help others learn how to invest and save.

Photo by Matteo Minoglio on Unsplash

author-card-avatar
AUTHORMarginofsaving Insider Comment
  • Er
    Erik J
    10 November 2019

    if you’ve worked for hedge funds for “many years “ and are still an analyst you’re probably not very good. your attitude toward your job also reflects this. if you don’t like it then go be a bank branch manager and leave at 5pm every day and make $75k

  • Hr
    Hrdnitlr
    13 October 2019

    Or more likely you really have trouble when it's a single big seller with only average-sized buyers in the market. Down, down, down, down, down .....

  • Q
    Q
    10 October 2019

    "And the best way to do that is by telling him/her that there are more sellers than buyers in the market.

    From a factual standpoint, this statement is 100% correct"

    That maybe be true in the discretionary realm. In the physical universe we live and based on the market-clearing mechanisms that govern the exchanges, the number of buyers and sellers is ALWAYS the same. I assume the idea behind that statement is that the price sellers are willing to sell is higher than the price buyers are willing to buy.

Sign up to our Newsletter!

Get advice to help you manage and drive your career.

Boost your career

Find thousands of job opportunities by signing up to eFinancialCareers today.
Latest Jobs
Northern Trust
Commercial Loan Closer, Banking
Northern Trust
Chicago, United States
Northern Trust
Account Manager, Investment Management
Northern Trust
Chicago, United States
Northern Trust
Wealth Advisory (IAP) Associate
Northern Trust
Chicago, United States
Northern Trust
Manager, Fund Accounting
Northern Trust
Boston, United States
Northern Trust
Analyst, Alternative Investments
Northern Trust
Tempe, United States
Anson McCade
Quant Researcher/PM
Anson McCade
Chicago, United States

Sign up to our Newsletter!

Get advice to help you manage and drive your career.