Discover your dream Career
For Recruiters

The CFA Institute is not really a super-profitable organization

This is a brief article for anyone who found out yesterday that they failed June's CFA Level I or Level II exams and is in search of some schadenfreude as rehabilitation, or for anyone who complains that the CFA Institute is unfairly charging them its $275 annual membership fee as a way of profiteering from financial services employees. - The CFA Institute is a not-for-profit organization with a tiny operating margin.

None of this will come as news to anyone familiar with the CFA's 2017 annual report, published on the internet for all to see (just Google 'Fiscal Year 2017, CFA Institute'). But it's worth stressing to anyone who thinks the CFA Institute is printing money on the back of its notoriously difficult exams.

Last year, the institute generated total operating revenues of $313m, mostly from its certification arm, as follows:

CFA revenues

However, these were almost entirely consumed by the Institute's enormous $304m operating expenses, distributed as per the screenshot below. The resulting operating margin for the CFA Institute last year was around 3%. Nor was this a one-off: in 2016, the CFA Institute's operating margin was 5%.

It might therefore be said that the charitable Institute is running its exams and membership services out of the goodness of its own heart.

CFA Institute expenses

Of course it's always possible to be more generous, particularly when it comes to member services. As the Institute's expense list shows, it's a very (very) big spender when comes to marketing. It's clearly a costly business staying at the forefront of candidates' minds. Marketing and communication spending at the Institute is nearly 40% higher than spending on member and society services, and only 22% below the Institute's spending on the exams themselves.

Have a confidential story, tip, or comment you’d like to share? Contact: sbutcher@efinancialcareers.com

Bear with us if you leave a comment at the bottom of this article: all our comments are moderated by human beings. Sometimes these humans might be asleep, or away from their desks, so it may take a while for your comment to appear. Eventually it will – unless it’s offensive or libelous (in which case it won’t.)

author-card-avatar
AUTHORSarah Butcher Global Editor
  • JB
    JB
    16 August 2018

    I’m curious if you took the time to read the proxy or review the CFA tax return? $98m (32%) of their take is salary and benefits. Another $15m is support staff wages. Add $38m for travel and hobnobbing. Please mention the $450m+ of investments on the balance sheet too. If you were an analyst and suggested this as good corporate governance you would be looking for a new career.

  • Tw
    Twizza Gee
    16 August 2018

    Maybe CFA should start using technology to process their exams to reduce costs and to increase candidates convenience. Rounding up thousands of people once a year in one or two locations (depending on country) is not only a huge concentration risk but also a pain for the candidates. I hate you guys.

    Sincerely
    A level 2 candidate

Sign up to our Newsletter!

Get advice to help you manage and drive your career.

Boost your career

Find thousands of job opportunities by signing up to eFinancialCareers today.
Latest Jobs
Standard Chartered Bank
Associate, ECS, Americas
Standard Chartered Bank
New York, United States
Standard Chartered Bank
Credit Flow MO Lead
Standard Chartered Bank
New York, United States
MFS Investment Management
Sales - Retail Internal Specialist
MFS Investment Management
Miami, United States
Northern Trust
Personal Banker
Northern Trust
North Palm Beach, United States
Northern Trust
Junior Repo Trader
Northern Trust
Chicago, United States

Sign up to our Newsletter!

Get advice to help you manage and drive your career.