Discover your dream Career
For Recruiters

Study Finds 2 Out of 3 American Workers Aren't Really Working All That Much

Nearly two-thirds (63 percent) of all U.S. workers are not fully engaged in their work, according to a new Global Workforce Study by professional services company Towers Watson.

The study of more than 30,000 workers in 29 different industry sectors including financial services also found that two out of three American workers are struggling to cope with work situations that don’t provide sufficient support.

Pressure to Do More with Less

This finding suggests employees are finding it difficult to sustain the kind of positive connection to their companies that yields consistent productivity—the result of almost a decade of pressure to do more with less and respond to the challenges of global competition, ever-evolving technology and the ongoing need for strict cost management.

“When workers are not fully engaged, it leads to greater performance risk for employers. It makes companies more vulnerable to lower productivity, higher inefficiency, weaker customer service and greater rates of absenteeism and turnover,” said Julie Gebauer, managing director, Talent and Rewards, Towers Watson.

“Without attention and interventions aimed at improving on-the-job support for employees and creating a sense of attachment to the organization, this trend could worsen—and directly affect business outcomes," said Gebauer.

"Companies have known for years that employee engagement is important to business performance," she added. "We’re now seeing—in part because of the tough business climate—that engagement is quite fragile and will not be sustained over time without careful attention to very specific elements in the work environment.”

A Fresh Perspective on Engagement

The study breaks new ground in understanding and measuring what contributes to sustained employee engagement in the workplace today and demonstrates the strength of the relationship between “sustainable engagement” and specific financial outcomes for employers.

“Sustainable engagement is an important evolution in the science of workforce behavior—and it’s an approach well suited to the unique aspects of the current work environment,” said Laura Sejen, global practice leader, Rewards, Towers Watson.

“It recognizes that employees need support from their employer to continue to give discretionary effort on the job, and right now, employees are telling us they’re not getting that support in the way and at a level they need," she added.

“This is an important wake-up call for U.S. companies if they hope to sustain their growth,” Sejen continued. “When we looked at sustainable engagement scores among 50 global companies in a related piece of research and examined their one-year operating margins, we saw dramatic evidence of the impact of sustainable engagement on performance. The companies with high sustainable engagement had operating margins almost three times those of organizations with a largely disengaged workforce. That fact alone creates a compelling case for change.”

Recipe for Success

The study findings point to specific actions employers can take to address the elements missing for these individuals in the work environment, putting solutions directly within companies’ control. “There is a real imperative for change right now," said Gebauer. "The risks of continuing to manage with traditional practices are just too great from a performance perspective. And everyone in an organization has a role to play in helping close gaps in employees’ feelings of enablement and energy—from executives, to supervisors, to human resources, to employees themselves. By taking actions to address identified gaps, organizations will be able to move some of the unsupported and detached to engaged—and likely experience a measurable and positive impact on financial performance.”

Other key findings from the study

  • Fewer than half (47 percent) agree there are no substantial obstacles to getting their job done well.
  • Slightly more than half (53 percent) don’t feel their organization makes it possible for them to have a healthy balance between work and personal life.
  • Just under a third (30 percent) say they’re bothered by excess pressure on the job.
  • Just under half (47percent) believe their supervisors don’t have enough time to handle the people aspects of their role.
  • Under one-third (32 percent) say their organization does a good job of providing opportunities for advancement.
  • Only 37 agree their senior management does a good job at developing future leaders.
  • Just under half (49 percent) say they have trust and confidence in their company’s senior leadership team.
author-card-avatar
AUTHORFred Yager Insider Comment
  • Mi
    MikeMiloserdoff
    19 July 2012

    A lot has changed since the 1980's. Then, it was more than commonplace, it was mandatory that an employment candidate would ask details of career path during an interview. Asking about career paths indicated to the employer that the candidate was interested in the company for the long term (i.e., loyal). In today's environment, it would probably come as an indicator that the candidate wanted to hijack someone else's position in the future.

    Training has come to a near-complete halt in most environments, eliminating the prospects of future advancement thru mentoring, enrichment programs, and the like, something which encouraged loyalty and added to one's energy in the workplace in the past scenarios of the workplace , rather than sapping one's energy in the workplace of today with "will I be here tomorrow" ?. A firm has more control over this aspect than they might be willing to admit to.

    I would say that in today's corporate environments very few senior management personnel even take the time to know people under the hierarchy that would be future leaders, let alone develop them. Why ? Probably because "it's all about me" ! and the personal and emotional distance that many firms of today wish to keep between employees.

    No more focus on the people in the organization that would leave 20+ years to another job, and take their company-specific knowledge with them neatly stored in their brain when they leave, leaving companies at a significant disadvantage when they leave.

    Loyalty is a two-way street, which was encouraged in past employment environments by such things as prospects for future advancement, enrichment programs which would create foundations for future advancement, and the like.

    Loyalty builds energy within an employee, but requires reciprocation, with inputs from the firm, as well as the individual. When the reciprocation ceases, the loyalty model falls apart. Loyalty is usually derived from the senses of security a reasonable employee has to an organization that they will still be employed there tomorrow, and is reinforced by items which support the organization's words, such as employees seeing inroads for advancement, and seeing development of future leaders right before their eyes, as opposed to bringing people in off of the street who are unknown to the rest of the employees in the firm. "Promotion from within" requires the appropriate actions, and not just words alone.

Sign up to our Newsletter!

Get advice to help you manage and drive your career.

Boost your career

Find thousands of job opportunities by signing up to eFinancialCareers today.
Latest Jobs
Coller Capital
Senior Finance Manager
Coller Capital
New York, United States
Deutsche Bank
Product Specialist Analyst
Deutsche Bank
New York, United States
Deutsche Bank
Vice President - {MP6618101}
Deutsche Bank
New York, United States
Deutsche Bank
Investment Banker - Vice President - Director
Deutsche Bank
New York, United States
Deutsche Bank
Origination and Execution Banker - Director
Deutsche Bank
New York, United States

Sign up to our Newsletter!

Get advice to help you manage and drive your career.