Discover your dream Career
For Recruiters

Headhunters are living in a bubble of delusion that must be burst, say banks

Internal recruiters in investment banks do not like search firms. They consider them expensive, duplicitous and delusional. And they would like to renegotiate their fees.

No internal recruiter is going to say any of this on the record. Off the record, however, is another matter.

"Search firms seem to be stuck in a different era," complains the EMEA head of recruitment at one bank. "They're still being extremely bullish and are requesting things like retainers."

"Search firms are living in a bubble," insists another. "They're not sharing the pain."

Antagonism between search firms and internal recruiters has increased since guaranteed bonuses became less common.

Historically, search firms charged fees that were a percentage of the total first year package of the individual they placed. When that total package included a guaranteed bonus, the fee was high. Now that guaranteed bonuses are rare, that fee is often lower. Search firms have attempted to get around this by increasing the fee as a percentage of salary. Banks don't like this.

Nor do banks like the fact that the percentage fee structure effectively incentivises search firms to seek guarantees for candidates. "This runs contrary to the bank's interests," complains the head of recruitment.

There are also complaints that search firms lie about fee caps - claiming that rival banks will pay up to 150k a hire, when the reality is considerably lower.

Understandably, banks would like to do something to emasculate pumped-up headhunters. Firstly, they'd like to stop paying them retainers. Secondly, they'd like to start paying them flat fees. Thirdly, they'd like to bring more hiring in-house.

Options two and three are proving challenging, however. "Flat fees are hard in areas like markets, where compensation varies widely by individual - search firms can feel hard done by," says one head of recruitment. Equally, where a hire must be made urgently line managers are often impatient to find the right person as soon as possible, and will ask search firms for assistance irrespective of the wishes of HR.

Nevertheless, an increasing proportion of banks' recruitment is being done without the intervention of external forces. Anything from 50-75% of hires are now done directly. At the top end, internal recruiters insist search firms are being dispensed with as much as possible.

"We're only using search where there's a real need," says one head of recruitment. "There's much less room in the market for the headhunters who are hangers-on."

author-card-avatar
AUTHORSarah Butcher Global Editor
  • Ai
    Aiden Stewart
    17 August 2020

    Hello Sarah Butcher

    How to complain about a recruitment agency?
    This comment is very useful for law purpose
    uk solicitor qredible

  • Go
    Gordon Gecko
    5 November 2011

    Oh I love he banter. Happy fireworks one and all.

  • vo
    voice of reason
    4 November 2011

    posh headhunter - its not a grammar test its a blog. if you think retained search is only used successfully at board level then you really are stuck in your made in chelsea bubble. its jumped up little toffs like yourself that give the industry a bad name, now run along to fortnum and mason for your weekly groceries

  • Th
    The Posh Headhunter
    4 November 2011

    Voice of Reason - you should watch your grammar; you risk giving "...both sides of the fence..." an even worse name.

    There is truth - mixed with the tawdry, hackneyed bile characteristic of these pages - in the defences offered by both internal and external recruiters. However, I would add that true headhunters/executive search practitioners rarely change their business model overnight. They stick to retained search - which is why you wont find the global, west end firms much in evidence on City mandates, beneath country head/board level. Regarding fee caps, these firms regularly transcend caps on high level mandates.

    Now, Sarah, run along and don't get into mischief.

  • Gw
    Gwyddon
    4 November 2011

    One issue that often seems to go unnoticed amongst the (often) juvenile and banal response from those we assume to be bankers is the undeniable fact that as there are bankers and bankers and banks and banks there are also recruiters and recruiters. Not every car is a Bentley or Rolls Royce etc and not every recruiter is Sharon and Daren from down town S Woodham Ferrers (easily recognisable, proverbial, stereotypes) I am sure that some of you have had extremely poor experiences with recruiters, both internal and external, but there are also very many who owe their new job to their head hunter. Take the time to go through LinkedIn and look at some of the recommendations that UK head-hunters have. I doubt if I would have survived in the business as long as I have if I treated people in the manner that it some stridently presented on this Forum. (Although it is quite possible that dear Ed is putting Scotch in her cider).

Sign up to our Newsletter!

Get advice to help you manage and drive your career.

Boost your career

Find thousands of job opportunities by signing up to eFinancialCareers today.
Latest Jobs
Northern Trust
Lead, Software Developer - Compliance
Northern Trust
Chicago, United States
Northern Trust
Specialist - Treasury Financial Reporting & Analysis
Northern Trust
Chicago, United States
Northern Trust
Associate Audit Director, Digital Transformation
Northern Trust
Chicago, United States
Northern Trust
Sr. Analyst, Loan Operations
Northern Trust
Chicago, United States
Northern Trust
Sr. Analyst, Loan Operations
Northern Trust
Chicago, United States

Sign up to our Newsletter!

Get advice to help you manage and drive your career.