Recruiters in Singapore have to take an exam. Should the same happen in the UK?
If you wish to work as a recruitment professional in Singapore, it is now necessary to take an examination first.
Our Singaporean site touched upon this subject this week, with a blog from an anonymous recruiter bemoaning the tedium of the classes leading up to the exam.
Spending five days studying competition law, immigration law and employment law might not be very exciting, but should recruitment professionals be obliged to engage in something similar in the UK?
As things stand, there is no mandatory qualification for UK (financial services) recruiters, and the industry here is unregulated.
The closest thing the UK has to a regulatory body is the Recruitment and Employment Confederation, a membership organization representing the UK recruitment industry, which includes the Institute of Recruitment Professionals (IRC) and has 5,500 individual members. There's also the Association of Executive Recruiters.
Scott Pendry, policy advisor at the Association of Executive Recruiters, points out that the Institute of Recruitment Professionals runs various examinations and that the government publishes guidance on recruiter conduct. The AER also publishes a code of practice and ousts members who fail to abide by it.
However, examinations and membership are not mandatory and it's not clear how members are policed.
Do you think financial services recruiters in the UK should be obliged to take a qualification in order to operate? And should the industry be regulated? Please leave your comments below.