Discover your dream Career
For Recruiters

Has all this investment in risk management technology been a monumental waste of time and money?

Over the last couple of years, risk technology has been hot area of recruitment within investment banks, hedge funds and fund managers alike. Even now, it continues to offer opportunities, but is all this investment worth it?

After all, UBS was one of the banks to plough money into upgrading its risk IT infrastructure last year, but alleged rogue trader Kweku Adoboli was still supposedly able to build up a rapidly worsening position undetected.

Most investment banks are continuing to invest in bolstering their risk IT systems, however.

Professor Chris Roebuck, visiting professor at Cass Business School and former global head of talent at UBS, says most risk managers accept that somebody within the organisation will do something wrong, but robust risk IT ensures (generally) that it doesn't "turn into a disaster".

"There will be a knee-jerk reaction from most investment banks to ensure the risk management systems are even more water-tight, but this misses the point," he says. "In order to move forward, and maximise performance within investment banks, there needs to be a moral compass within the organisation to stop wrong-doing in the first place."

It's perhaps too early to say whether any new risk IT roles have emerged as a direct reaction of the case at UBS. However, most financial services firms remain keen to recruit in this area.

"Obviously, there could always be someone persistent or ingenious enough to circumvent risk IT controls within an organisation, but the financial crisis has highlighted just how critical these controls are," says Paul Elworthy, head of the banking and financial services practice at recruiters Hudson. "Investment banks, hedge funds, consultants and asset managers are all still hiring in this area."

Most investment banks are having to upgrade their credit risk systems because of regulatory demands, while also working on intra-day risk platforms for the front office in order to gain a competitive advantage, suggests Paul Bennie, director of IT in finance headhunters Bennie MacLean.

"We've been working on a number of senior and mid-level risk roles in recent months, and we'd expect the recent rogue trading case to spur more investment in this area," he says.

author-card-avatar
AUTHORPaul Clarke
  • Po
    Poppela
    29 September 2011

    But does the failure of IT systems not signify the down side of technology? you can argue that each time there are yet again new rules and regs that IT are kept in employment, but surely this issue should highlight more then just trying to invent a new system?

    My point is, the system was built to detect such activities (some how) but it failed to do so. Is this not a legal issue as the system did not live up to its description?

  • Po
    Pooky
    29 September 2011

    As IT contractor all I can say is long may it last, every ridiculous piece of regulation keeps me feed and watered. Long live Basel!

  • Th
    Thorsten
    29 September 2011

    Yes

  • th
    the truth
    29 September 2011

    i would say yes

  • Ri
    Risk_Veteran
    28 September 2011

    The problem is related to people who are trying replace the legacy systems, they do not have the knowledge and/or experience to replace or upgrade these legacy systems. As they have never build or implemented a risk platform from first principal before in the majority of cases. That why they either take years and fail to deliver (majority of cases) before another crisis hits and they have to change direction due to the regulator changing their minds of what is a critical requirement

Sign up to Morning Coffee!

Coffee mug

The essential daily roundup of news and analysis read by everyone from senior bankers and traders to new recruits.

Sign up to Morning Coffee!

Coffee mug

The essential daily roundup of news and analysis read by everyone from senior bankers and traders to new recruits.