Discover your dream Career
For Recruiters

GUEST COMMENT: Why do so many ethnic minorities in financial services end up in IT, or the back office?

Having broken away from working in our parent's corner shops and restaurants, second generation Asians like myself are now often stereotyped for following professions such as medicine, law or dentistry.

But you only have to walk through the office of any major bank in the Square Mile or Canary Wharf to see that blacks and Asians make up a sizeable number of the total employees. Gender diversity seems to receive a lot of attention in the media, but racial diversity less so.

During my ten-year career in the City I worked at both investment banks and vendors consulting across pretty much every major trading floor in London and New York. It became apparent to me that the majority of black, Asian and other ethnic minorities are well represented (or perhaps over-represented) in certain areas such as technology, operations and at junior to mid-level management positions.

However, it's also quite clear that this diversity does not necessarily extend to front office and more senior positions in many firms. Given the large numbers of ethnic minorities that have entered the industry over the years, why is diversity not extending to senior level and client facing roles?

There's no clear answer to this. An article in the Harvard Business Review blog recently stated that although Asians in the US make up 5% of the total workforce, they only account for 1.8% of Fortune 500 CEOs and barely 2% of board members.

Some argue minorities come from less privileged educational and social backgrounds and therefore struggle to reach the upper echelons at blue-blooded institutions. Others (controversially in this article) state that some ethnic minorities tend to have less aggressive personalities due to their cultural or religious backgrounds.

In fairness, a lot of the larger banks have been investing in diversity initiatives for many years now. I would argue that some bulge bracket US investment banks, and I've worked in many, have done very well to ensure the workforce is racially diverse from the CEO downwards.

However, there's still a big disparity within many European, small and mid-cap banks, as well as buy-side firms, where you would have to be blind not notice that there is a distinct lack of diversity at senior level.

But on the flip side, consider that many of the major Indian consulting firms now expanding in the West also lack white and European nationalities in their senior ranks. The importance for diversity in Eastern firms is just as important for their business in the West and globally.

It's human nature, at a subconscious level, to like people that are similar to us. There's also pressure to follow what is seen as commercially viable to keep a team or organisation's demographic the same.

However, a diverse workforce benefits business by utilising people with distinctly different backgrounds and upbringings to solve problems in uniquely different ways increase creativity and innovation. In addition, due to the huge growth in China and India and an increasingly global marketplace, diversity of senior staff in financial services firms is already gaining rapid attention for the right reasons.

Finally, it's important to realise the importance that head-hunters and recruiters play in the process of diversity. It is recruiters that shortlist the candidates that are put forward to hiring managers, so it's just as important that the recruitment industry educates itself around diversity and takes the subject seriously rather than just a check box exercise or marketing ploy.

Whether considering ethnicity, gender, age, culture, sexual orientation, disability or religious belief, diversity will play an increasingly important topic in our careers.

Diversity does not have to be about controversial quota systems or arguing about 'glass ceilings', but when focused on the business case for diversity, understanding how we behave, how we can change this and in light of the rapidly transforming global market place, diversity can be considered from a more positive and thought-provoking perspective.

Kuljeet Chahal is managing director of Vivacity Executive Search & Selection: a niche recruitment company specialising in project, programme, and change management professionals to the financial services and consulting industries. Vivacity organises regular networking events around gender and race diversity to raise awareness of issues and assist organisations in recruiting from diverse talent pools.

author-card-avatar
AUTHORKuljeet Chahal Insider Comment
  • TR
    TR
    27 September 2011

    @Indian American banker

    Happy that you have not experienced the challenges others have had or have been able to rise above them through hard work and determination. Large numbers of people work hard, have all the skills (including soft skills) and yet still see issues around diversity holding them back. To dismiss their problems as a lack of skills, integration, trust or growing up in an "Indian bubble" shows a poor understanding of the issues involved and an incorrect focus on diversity simply being a racial or "Indian" issue. The fixation on how "American" you are seems to be more about your own insecurities and is irrelevant because shockingly American companies also discriminate against the truest stars'n'stripes Americans. The companies you cite as meritocracies did not simply happen that way and many have gone before you to make them fairer and more diverse; there are still large numbers of companies where this is not the case. So again I do applaud your success and self belief is great though arrogance is not. A little more humility please and recognition of how your successes became possible would be good.

  • In
    Indian American banker
    18 September 2011

    @bright smark "this 'indian bubble' you speak of is irrelevant, we are actually proud of our Indian roots and culture here in UK."

    Are you trying to prove my point or yours? Truth is you are not only isolating yourselves but the "Indian roots and culture" you are talking about doesn't even exist anymore. The educated class in India has embraced the 21st century global order and are better equipped to excel in the City while most of you are stuck holding on to antiquated piece of mid 20th century rural India and then wonder why your white colleagues discount you. Then you get predictably defensive, go on about racism and wonder why you are not accepted.

    I am a friend of India and will put my knowledge of its history, business, politics and literature up against anyone. But India is not my country. My country is America and I'm darn proud of THAT. My parents rightly raised me that way.

    When you guys rebalance your relationship towards India, treat Britain and only Britain as YOUR country, maybe the rest of your compatriots will trust you to run major companies and governments. Until then your complaints sound very hollow even to a sympathetic if neutral observer like

  • Am
    Amir
    9 September 2011

    I work in a traditional asset management company and it's the same old story over here. The Oxbridge types (overwhelmingly white and upper/middle class) get the best jobs (fund managers and research analysts). The Asians are usually in the back office and IT areas.

    I think that American companies are more meritocratic and the European ones, as their culture is based on mass immigration. In Europe, Asian are expected to "know their place" and keep their heads down.

    So for in the UK, if you're an "old school tie", from Oxbridge, you'll be invariably white and middle/upper class and you'll be fast streamed into the best jobs.

    If you're an Asian, from a red-brick university in a working class town, with no good connections, you'll go to the dull back-office or IT jobs in a bank.

  • Am
    Amir
    8 September 2011

    I work in a traditional asset management company and it's the same old story over here. The Oxbridge types (overwhelmingly white and upper/middle class) get the best jobs (fund managers and research analysts). The Asians are usually in the back office and IT areas.

    I think that American companies are more meritocratic and the European ones, as their culture is based on mass immigration. In Europe, Asian are expected to "know their place" and keep their heads down.

    So for in the UK, if you're an "old school tie", from Oxbridge, you'll be invariably white and middle/upper class and you'll be fast streamed into the best jobs.

    If you're an Asian, from a red-brick university in a workclass town, with no good connections, you'll go to the dull back-office or IT jobs in a bank.

  • TR
    TR
    8 September 2011

    Great discussion, though it seems some haven't really read or understood the article properly.

    Diversity isn't about quotas or getting preference, it's about fairness of opportunity in the work place irrespective of colour, gender, disability, orientation etc. Now more organisations are realising it also makes good business sense for the workforce and management makeup to reflect their clients and target markets. Global companies increasingly see lack of diversity as something that can restrict growth into new markets keeping this an ongoing and relevant topic for next decade and beyond. Diversity and the cause and effects are still evolving. And yes, this means Indian and Chinese companies will be hiring more non-Indians and non-Chinese as well !

    Kuljeet has provided a balanced insight into a difficult subject showing the business advantages and has highlighted the role recruiters play in diversity by ensuring hiring managers see ALL the best candidates for a role.

Sign up to Morning Coffee!

Coffee mug

The essential daily roundup of news and analysis read by everyone from senior bankers and traders to new recruits.

Sign up to Morning Coffee!

Coffee mug

The essential daily roundup of news and analysis read by everyone from senior bankers and traders to new recruits.