Discover your dream Career
For Recruiters

If you want to find a new job you will need to massively reduce your compensation expectations

Are you looking for a new job? Are you hoping to receive a little compensatory uplift when you find it? Are you also hoping that this uplift will be based not on last year's pay package (which was lower than usual and therefore clearly a weird anomaly) but on what you received for 2009/2010?

You are deluded.

Recruiters say candidates' pay expectations are absurdly high. These delusional notions of market value are preventing people from getting hired.

"We've been trying to move someone who was paid 200k last year and 350k the year before, but who wants 400k to move into a new job," says one headhunter. "People want a premium, but they are not being realistic about it."

This lack of realism is pervading everything.

"I'm trying to move a guy who was paid 975k for 2010. For 2009 and 2008 he was paid 1.2m. The client's offering him 975k on the grounds that bonuses are going to be down 20% this year, but he won't accept," another headhunter complained to us last week.

If you intend to get hired into a front office role in the second half of 2011, you must therefore cultivate pragmatism.

Sales and trading revenues especially are down substantially this year. Goldman Sachs is shifting jobs to Singapore because it's cheaper there. Redundancies are happening.

Are you going to get hired in London if you insist on earning more than you did in 2009? No.

On the other hand, are you willing to take a risk and move into a job you don't know very much about for less than 20% guaranteed financial upside? No.

You must therefore content yourself with staying in your current job until one of two things happens: either the market will pick up and someone will pay you what you require to move into a new position; or the market won't pick up, there will be more redundancies and you will be coerced into adjusting your pay expectations downwards horribly.

The choice is yours. Let us know what you think is most rational in the circumstances - bearing in mind that real disposable incomes in the UK are currently falling anyway.

author-card-avatar
AUTHORSarah Butcher Global Editor
  • Jo
    John
    28 June 2011

    I agree with Realistic. If you move now it will be most likely to a job that no one in the company wants (hassle, long hours, bad manager). Too many cannon fodder vacancies out there. Stay put.

  • Sh
    Shaz
    28 June 2011

    Anna you do have it all figured out. Like.

  • Jo
    Jobless
    28 June 2011

    @Anna - I like your style, you wouldn't be single by any chance

  • An
    Anna
    28 June 2011

    Those still in employment should stay put and wait for better times. Those without a job should accept any offer they can get, even if it pays less than half of what would be fair, and dump without hesitation such employers as soon as the market improves. And, of course, if you are being paid poorly, don't over-work yourself, just pretend hard work.

  • Mr
    Mr. Equilibrium
    28 June 2011

    If people willing to move anticipate this, the likelihood of sucessfully changing positions increases. Employers willing to hire people will most likely have taken expected headcount reductions into account and will not hire people they will have to fire a few months / weeks later. Moving now would therefore lead to a high likelihood of success of securing a job you will not be fired from shortly.

Sign up to Morning Coffee!

Coffee mug

The essential daily roundup of news and analysis read by everyone from senior bankers and traders to new recruits.

Sign up to Morning Coffee!

Coffee mug

The essential daily roundup of news and analysis read by everyone from senior bankers and traders to new recruits.