Discover your dream Career
For Recruiters

If you leave the market this time, you won't come back

Banks are already eradicating people. If revenues suffer, as seems likely, from Greek-inspired risk aversion, they may eradicate more jobs still.

Since the lows of 2008, most banks have ramped up headcount considerably. For example, BarCap has around 1,700 more people than three years ago; Goldman has 6,000 more; Credit Suisse and UBS have around 2,000 and 2,300 more respectively.

In the event of another seizure of the financial system, that's a lot of additional people to carry through a period of poor revenues. As JPMorgan analyst Kian Abouhossein noted last week, many banks no longer have the luxury of riding out revenue reductions by cutting bonuses: at UBS he estimates that 82% of compensation costs are now fixed, versus 66% in 2009.

All of this seems to spell something very nasty for the front office job seeker.

"Banks are having redundancies. It's continuous, but below the radar. As the business continues to contract, they're going to keep cutting. They've finally realised they've got bull market employees in a bear market world," says Jason Kennedy, managing director of search firm Kennedy Associates.

So what happens if you lose your job at this juncture?

Kennedy has a grave warning for those involuntarily leaving the market now: "This time, the people who leave the market won't come back," he says. "The market's contracting. They're not going to get new jobs."

Who's not hiring

Rumours of hiring freezes for front office positions are gathering pace. The former head of recruitment at one European investment bank points out that freezes are never absolute and will always be broken for strategic hires, but they definitely make hiring harder.

BarCap's said to have a freeze in its markets division, so too is Credit Suisse. Others, like Nomura are still said to be upgrading - despite boasting of aggressive cost discipline only last week.

Time to drop your price?

The key reason banks are hesitant about recruiting now is, predictably, cost.

Hence, UBS's global head of commodities said last week that he had planned to hire 30 people for 2011, but is now only hiring 15 on the grounds that "People who are good are really expensive."

One headhunter confirms this: "I'm trying to move a guy who was paid 975k for 2010. For 2009 and 2008 he was paid 1.2m. The client's offering him 975k on the grounds that bonuses are going to be down 20% this year, but he won't accept."

If you get ejected from the market in 2011, can you therefore job drop your price to get back in? The headhunter isn't so sure.

"The difference in 2008 was that the senior managers who were thrown out had money and experience behind them and could afford to take their time. Now, a lot of people who are being let go don't have money and have been promoted rapidly over the past few years. They're going to be pretty desperate to get back in and the more desperate they are, the less they'll be wanted," he predicts ominously.

Equally, post-2008, banks' FICC revenues were boosted by interest rate cuts and quantitative easing. This encouraged rebuilding. In the event of a sovereign debt crisis, European banking crisis and global currency realignment, this may not be repeated.

The positive perspective

More promisingly, Philip Beddows, a founder partner of executive coaching firm The Silk Road Partnership, says it's never impossible to get back into the market.

"When someone says to me that they can't back in, I won't agree as I'm always optimistic for people" he says. "It's about finding a niche which exists for yourself that might not be evident today and putting together a business plan for re-launching yourself into the market as a commercial proposition."

People losing their jobs in 2011 will need to hope Beddows, not Kennedy, is right.

AUTHORSarah Butcher Global Editor
  • si
    sick of you
    29 June 2011

    Is it the controversy you get a kick out of or scaring people to death? you think it's easy to find a career in another industry having spent your whole career in investment banking? pharmaceutical companies or telcos are not exactly clamouring over each other to hire bankers - they have no reason to do that. will bankers really be terminally unemployable? this article is far too general and gives the wrong impression. yes...banks are deciding to try and do more with less....but it moves in cycles. if you can't see that then you are short-sighted.

  • Ex
    24 June 2011

    80-20 Rule = 80% of bank staff are a waste of space, only 20% are truly competent. Too much emphasis on style over substance so I don't have much sympathy if the belts are tightened.

  • No
    Not yet a banker
    24 June 2011

    Insanity is very important. Call me if you decide to jump off a bridge.

  • St
    Still banker
    23 June 2011

    Who cares? I became insane here anyway.

  • Ex
    23 June 2011

    Who cares? There are much better opportunities out there.

Apply for jobs

Find thousands of jobs in financial services and technology by signing up to eFinancialCareers today.

Boost your career

Find thousands of job opportunities by signing up to eFinancialCareers today.
Latest Jobs
State Street Corporation
Technology Solutions Architect / Delivery Lead
State Street Corporation
Quincy, United States
State Street Corporation
Application Development / Maintenance, AVP
State Street Corporation
Princeton, United States
Standard Chartered Bank
Director, Debt Capital Markets
Standard Chartered Bank
New York, United States
Standard Chartered Bank
Global Implementation Manager
Standard Chartered Bank
New York, United States
Standard Chartered Bank
Executive Director, Financing and Investment Solutions
Standard Chartered Bank
New York, United States