Discover your dream Career
For Recruiters

GUEST COMMENT: Observations on the advantages of having been to Oxbridge

One of my teachers once ticked me off for referring to Oxbridge and insisted on the long form; however I am going to use the diminutive and he'll have to forgive me if he is still alive.

People often ask whether I think having been to Oxbridge confers advantages. My answer is that, of course it does. But it also has some subtle drawbacks, not the least of which is that everybody you come across who hasn't been there is defensive and out to get you. In an organisation, much of the everyday interaction in the workplace is a subliminal expression of people's prejudices and their defence of their status within the organisation.

Conversely, the first advantage is that you get a shot at the best jobs because wherever else the big firms go recruiting, they always go to Oxbridge.

The second advantage is that the networking and the alumni system is powerful. Unfortunately, for the first 20 years of your career you are by and large competing against your peer group. People only get round to being properly helpful when they are in their forties and don't feel they have to be competitive any more. At this point, they have either become successful - in which case they can exercise their power of patronage, or they haven't - in which case they can call upon that patronage without being a threat.

But incalculably, the main advantage is that at Oxbridge you receive a proper university education. Inter alia, it teaches you to express yourself clearly, so that you can do things like write a letter or a report correctly. You are often taught by the people who actually wrote the books, which, apart from making you feel smug, gives you more of an incentive to read them!

Moreover, graduates of Oxbridge tend to have a higher level of intellectual curiosity than normal. They may be selected for that trait by the university, or it is inculcated in them by the environment. Either way, one can be reasonably sure that they will have the ability to think for themselves.

Oxbridge produces thinkers in a way that other universities produce people with skill sets. Skill sets are useful, but the world of work is always moving forward as new technology and new modus operandi replace the old ways; people need to be able to adapt and the people most adept at this are those whose minds have been taught to think for themselves in a disciplined manner.

The author is a senior headhunter who has also spent some time in the industry

author-card-avatar
AUTHORAnonymous Insider Comment
  • Ja
    Jay
    12 May 2018

    To the author, I would love to network. From an Oxbridge alumni. Physicist.

  • Si
    Silverback
    19 May 2011

    I thought might actually be interesting, but it's just an excuse for the author to masturbate over his uni :/

  • Sa
    Saifullah
    19 May 2011

    Hahahahaha

    The moment I saw the blurb for this article in my email, I thought about writing a comment along the lines of "I'd like to see the headhunter-bashers on here have a pop at one who used to be a former investment banker".

    It gladdens my cynical heart to see that some people have had a commendable bash at it nevertheless.

    I think there ARE advantages to having gone to Cambridge (can't speak for the dark side!), but these are mainly in actually getting in, as the author says. However, I disagree with the author in that once you're in, it's largely irrelevant if your course was "relevant" or not because let's be honest, hardly anyone actually uses the stuff they learnt at uni in their day-to-day job - we all just do a degree to show we can do it!

  • Bo
    Bored
    18 May 2011

    Look - I drive a BMW M5...I lord it over most road users... then I see a 911 turbo at the lights, I am upstaged, then he sees an SLR - the same happens....who cares...Oxbridge, LSE, UCL, Ivy league. Food chain. Deal with it. Bore off.

  • BA
    BA (Oxon)
    18 May 2011

    @Nicholas - Agreed.

    "Coincidently 2 of the brightest (recent recruits) on our desk are from UCL.... Not that this means anything." Yes it does, it means that you work at a firm that can't attract oxbridge applicants, like RBS or any other second rate I-Bank. The same applies to everyone else commenting with their BS anecdotal evidence.

    Oxford and Cambridge are the best universties are the best in the UK by some distance as the league tables show. As a result they atract, and choose, the brightest and best. The dregs of the applicants worm their way into the crummy redbricks like LSE and UCL, pretending that this is where they really wanted to end up. This is probably true to an extent; they are full of low achievers who make each other feel better by being equally sh1t at life.

    In a gloriously self-perpetuating cycle Oxford attracts the best candidates, which enhances its reputation thereby attracting the best candidates ad infinitum. Top employers recognise this and have milkrounds only at Oxford and Cambridge, we get the best jobs that the redbirkcers have never even heard of.

    I think, therefore I am better than you.

Sign up to Morning Coffee!

Coffee mug

The essential daily roundup of news and analysis read by everyone from senior bankers and traders to new recruits.

Sign up to Morning Coffee!

Coffee mug

The essential daily roundup of news and analysis read by everyone from senior bankers and traders to new recruits.