Discover your dream Career
For Recruiters

GUEST COMMENT: The bonus culture is a self-created myth in the collective mind of the financial world

Not too long ago, the use of bonuses was believed to be an

effective compensation system.

By providing these financial incentives, the thinking went that people would be motivated to work harder and perform better. Sadly, this doesn't seem to be the case.

Bonuses encourage the wrong type of motivation.

The best kind of motivation is 'intrinsic motivation.' This refers to the idea that people do a job well because they truly enjoy the things they have to do. They are motivated to perform their tasks well because they like to and not because they have to.

If you are intrinsically motivated, the focus is on the job itself and not on the perks it may bring.

Unfortunately, the use of incentive pay in the financial world seems to have undermined this intrinsic motivation.

Instead of being offered as a reward for a job well done, bonuses are too often handed out simply because the job was done. Intrinsic motivation is therefore replaced by 'extrinsic motivation': the bonus is no longer the reward and, instead, has become the motivation.

A psychological consequence of such an extrinsically motivated state

of mind is that, for the individual, the interest in one's job diminishes

and, ultimately, the quality of work suffers.

If the negative effect of the bonus incentive construction is so great, why keep it?

I interviewed 15 executives from different banks with hiring responsibilities. My findings indicated that the bonus culture is a self-created myth maintained in the collective mind of the financial world.

Each banker said that personally, the bonus culture had limited effect on his own motivation. However, each equally felt that bonuses were crucial to hiring and motivating others.

The thinking is that others are motivated by financial incentives, so it is necessary to invariably provide them. This is wrong. For bonuses to function correctly they must genuinely be a reward for work objectively well done. They must not be a habit. Bonuses need to return to their rightful place in the motivational hierarchy: somewhere near the bottom.

author-card-avatar
AUTHORProfessor David De Cremer Insider Comment
  • Sc
    Scott
    7 June 2011

    I agree with the professor. Bankers think they deserve the Bonus because they work harder, however it's the bonus which drives them into that career, and they forget that other's have to work in undesirable careers with no choice... and part of their hard work is what bailed them out. If they failed again they may just end up living in a Country like Mozambique, or an undemocratic society. Then who will they be asking to bail them out. We all have long memories

  • Ol
    Ole
    23 February 2011

    Que es un dole que? Un dole queue Espanol?

  • Be
    Berlusconi
    23 February 2011

    I am sick of all these clowns and "professors" bashing bonuses. He forgets that the city has a carrot and stick policy, you get paid well for a job well done else you are on the dole que. Unless you work in the middle office that is. What kind of a nut is a professor in "Organisational Beahviour" anyways ?

  • Di
    DisillusionedBanker
    23 February 2011

    David,
    You've never worked in the financial services industry have you?
    The point of paying fat bonuses is not to increase motivation, but simply to retain staff. A lot of the jobs to which those bonuses are awarded are time-consuming, life-consuming, stressful, brutal, unstable and not always intellectually satisfying. In those conditions why the heck would you stay loyal to your employer if you feel underpayed and if competition offers you 40% more?
    And frankly I don't see in what way "instrinsic motivation" would be mutually exclusive with a competitive compensation package. But according to you I should try to have as much fun as possible in my 15h workdays and leave my bonus to my bank's shareholders? Nonsense.
    Truth is, I would never stay in this industry to get paid like the average joe, and rather pick up an ultra-flexible job like yours, writing useless and misinformed theoretical papers nobody cares about. Perhaps investment banks makes excessive profit and therefore attract talent which would be better used elsewhere but that is an ENTIRELY different issue right?

  • an
    anon
    23 February 2011

    "Share in the profits"? C'mon, you are not some financial genius just because you happened to be working in a boom period. Rising tide and all that...

Sign up to Morning Coffee!

Coffee mug

The essential daily roundup of news and analysis read by everyone from senior bankers and traders to new recruits.

Sign up to Morning Coffee!

Coffee mug

The essential daily roundup of news and analysis read by everyone from senior bankers and traders to new recruits.