Discover your dream Career
For Recruiters

Candidate to bank: I'm not taking a job in Australia - it's too expensive

Last week we told you what delegates at the recent eFinancialCareers roundtable thought about compensation. Today's report focuses on the twin terrors of finding foreign talent and dealing with agency recruiters. The event in Sydney was attended by 16 senior HR people from international and local financial institutions, all of whom asked not to be named.

The costly country

Representatives from several large firms said the rising cost of living in Australia is making it more difficult to recruit or internally relocate overseas candidates, especially professionals with young families.

Candidates from Europe think Australia is a "paradise where the sun always shines" and they have high expectations about working here, said one delegate. But that's before they do the salary, tax and cost of living calculations, he added.

"Global competition for talent is heating up, especially with the growth of Asia, and we have recently lost candidates from Europe to low tax places like Singapore and Hong Kong," said another attendee.

Employers need to re-educate candidates that Australia is not a cheap destination. "It's very important to mention costs early on in the hiring process. We don't want to get to offer stage and they say 'wow, Australia's so expensive, no thanks'."

Coping with recruiters

The financial services sector is becoming less reliant on recruiters as more roles are handled in-house. Many banks have reduced the size of their recruiter panels but have included a higher proportion of niche agencies who can fill senior and/or specialist roles.

"Smaller panels mean you get better commitment from the agency. It has a greater chance of securing each role because it's not up against so many competitors," said one roundtable attendee.

However, as firms do more of their own hiring, some recruiters are trying to bypass HR and "float" CVs directly to line managers. "They are doing this out of frustration. We in HR are increasingly viewed as competitors to them."

One bank has a tough policy to stop recruiters contacting the business: "If they float, we won't pay them. It works pretty well."

A representative from another firm said managers should be told not to encourage the practice. "More internal education is needed about the reasons why recruitment should be channelled via HR. We have to prevent leakage into the business."

An additional problem plaguing the HR/recruiter relationship is that having been "decimated" during the GFC, agencies are now rebuilding with less experienced staff. "A lot of them think that international investment banks are all the same. Recruiters must prove that they know about our particular business."

author-card-avatar
AUTHORSimon Mortlock Content Manager
  • Re
    Recruiter
    11 March 2011

    Resourcing (not HR) are a mixed bag. There are some good commercially aware internal resourcers who balance internal KPI's and what the business need. However some of the Big 4 have taken the resoucing function to a level where they are simply transactionalising the process. They are very poor at dealing with there own brand issues and awareness and also having any form of relationship that is meaningful with recruitment firms.

    And these are mostly x-recruiters....not HR. If we meet internal recruiters the theme is all about compliance. I have never had an internal recruiter inspire me about their company and brand. Pretty sad exisitance in the professional world if that is the attitude which is taken to the role. That said they are not all like this.

    HR in fact as actually improved as they can get on with real HR issues. HR have never really wanted to be responsible for recruitment for the most part..

    As for Australia as expensive, unless you get an expat deal into HK or Singapore then they will can be as expensive if not more, tax rate included.

  • Ph
    Phil
    4 March 2011

    HR are usually an impediment to getting things done quickly. They are helpful at providing advice at times when you are trying to navigate employemnt laws.
    @Sean - a good People Manager does knows at least the basics of employment law, employee psychology, motivation, understands body language, is an effective appraiser of staff, can give feedback and offer effective development strategies etc......

  • gg
    gg
    4 March 2011

    Never try to talk to an HR person in confidence, they will use what you say against you. The fact is that HR have no idea what employees (i'm front line) have to deal with and the pressures that being a profit generator faces (as opposed to being an expensive cost centre).

    As for the high cost of living in Australia, why are Aussies so proud of this?

  • us
    uss esses
    4 March 2011

    "Bear in mind that the majority of my internal recruitment team are failed recruiters in the outside world!!"

    Aint that the truth.

    An HR function to protect the company from employees legally is necessary, but other than that, stay away from the business please.

    you don't know how to screen technical people, and you don't have the finesse or street cred to negotiate with experienced candidates.

    Also, please stop expending effort on internal training. You are not educators. No one takes you seriously, and no, there is no consuting career path after HR, even in the public school system, if that's what you're shooting for.

  • Ex
    Expat
    3 March 2011

    Australia = "Land of The Fee". Deal with it. A great place. Especially compared to anywhere in Europe. See the extra living costs as a very acceptable premium for not living in London, Frankfurt, Paris, New York or Johannesburg....

Sign up to Morning Coffee!

Coffee mug

The essential daily roundup of news and analysis read by everyone from senior bankers and traders to new recruits.

Sign up to Morning Coffee!

Coffee mug

The essential daily roundup of news and analysis read by everyone from senior bankers and traders to new recruits.