Discover your dream Career
For Recruiters

How banks intend to avoid the FSA's restrictions on bonus buybacks

As we've said several times, the FSA is banning buybacks. From now on, it will not be possible to negotiate a generous bonus from an existing employer simply by threatening to leave.

Or will it?

The FSA's Remuneration Code says that:

"Retention awards may be granted in exceptional circumstances,

such as a corporate restructuring and where a strong case can be made for retention of particular key staff members on prudential grounds.

and that...

Proposals to give retention awards should form part of any notice of the restructuring proposals.

Alert to this, the head of recruitment at one bank says an idea is coalescing around the restructuring exemption. "Every department will simply have a restructuring plan," he says. "If that's what it takes to be allowed to retain our top people, that's what we'll do."

Will it work?

Probably not, say lawyers.

"The exemption will only work if it's a genuine major restructuring rather than something that's being done solely for the purpose of permitting buybacks," says Sam Whitaker, counsel in law firm Shearman & Sterling's executive compensation and employee benefits practice.

What constitutes a major restructuring?

The FSA gives some guidance in Section 15.3.8 of its Handbook, where it specifies examples such as: 'setting up a new undertaking within a firm's group,'

'commencing the provision of cross border services into a new territory;' 'commencing the provision of a new type of product or service (whether in the United Kingdom or overseas)'; or 'ceasing to undertake a regulated activity or ancillary activity, or significantly reducing the scope of such activities'.

As such, it may be possible to offer buybacks if a bank's in the process of making redundancies, says Whitaker.

Whilst this may appear to open the door to the resumption of widespread retention bonuses, Jon Terry, head of compensation and benefits at PricewaterhouseCoopers points out that buybacks can only be offered in 'exceptional circumstances'. And the head of financial services at a magic circle law firm in the City points out that the FSA's concept of 'retention bonuses' is based around the pre-emptive payment of retention awards when a restructuring plan is devised - rather than the reactive payments of retention bonuses when someone tries to leave.

Nice try, therefore, but not necessarily effective.

author-card-avatar
AUTHORSarah Butcher Global Editor
  • ol
    oliviertag
    6 January 2011

    Economist or communist?? The latter didn't work out too well if I remember properly!

  • da
    dac401
    6 January 2011

    Economist ??

  • Fr
    Front Office Recruiter (ex ban
    6 January 2011

    Thanks for your suggestion, Economist, very innovative! In reality, with the City generating c10% of the UK's GDP (as an economist I'm sure you'll know the accurate figure), your "best solution" would be nothing short of national suicide. There's the way we would like the world to be and there's the way it really is....

  • Ec
    Economist
    6 January 2011

    This shows the toothlessness of the FSA, and how it's been unable to curb the immoral bonuses being paid by the banks. The best solution would be to nationalise the City itself, and have it run for the public good. Instead of the City operating to make obscene profits, the banks will be controlled by government to lend to small businesses at good rates, and to fund development projects and promote regional growth in areas that have suffered from Thatcher's ideological assault on manufacturing in favour of finance.

Sign up to Morning Coffee!

Coffee mug

The essential daily roundup of news and analysis read by everyone from senior bankers and traders to new recruits.

Sign up to Morning Coffee!

Coffee mug

The essential daily roundup of news and analysis read by everyone from senior bankers and traders to new recruits.