Discover your dream Career
For Recruiters

The Inbetweener: How to tell someone she's just too expensive for the job

I recently caught up with an old friend (actually she isn't much of an old friend, rather an old roommate, but I digress) who had been grizzling about being out of work for six months.

I asked her why she left her contract role and what she was looking to go into. She responded that she wanted to break into project management, despite having a pure IT background. Knowing this girl's character, I decided to keep pressing her as to why she left her contract to embark on such a risky journey when the job market has only recently started to improve.

As it turns out, she did want to stay with her old employer when her contract came up for renewal. But when the negotiations began, she advised the HR manager that she wanted a 40 per cent pay increase and a career change from IT into project management. Needless to say, the manager told her, rather impolitely, where to go.

The problem for me is that I can't tell her that the arrogance of her demands is the most likely cause of her current unemployment. She still truly believes that she was well within her rights to make these demands and that the "system" is to blame for her not getting any other contracts.

However, when I probed a little further, I discovered that she knew very little about project management roles and pay levels. As result, she priced herself out of the contract market, given her existing skills and experience.

So how do you tell a friend that his or her employment demands are just too excessive?

My friend lacked project management experience, but she tried to get a job at the top end of the price range. To me it seems bleedingly obvious that she is taking the wrong path. But is she really? Have the markets turned so quickly that candidates can now start placing such demands on potential employers?

I'm a little confused because on the one hand I keep hearing from these prominent commentators that the market is just "so hot right now", but then I hear about more job losses in the pipeline. So which is it?

In my humble opinion, I still think we need to be cautious and avoid making arrogant decisions which may turn into mistakes. But perhaps I have just reverted to conservative ways, given what has happened in the last few years.

Have you ever had to advise someone with unacceptable employment demands? Perhaps you were a recruiter coaching a candidate, or like me, a friend talking to a friend. What did you say?

author-card-avatar
AUTHORAnonymous Insider Comment
  • MS
    MS
    16 September 2010

    Everything is slowly or has become commoditized. There was a time when DVD players were costing thousands of dollars and not can be bought for $19.99 at Walmart or at any discount store anywhere in the world. This is happening with the labor force as well - be it IT, Finance, medical etc... People from countries where opportunities are scarce and suppky is a lot are getting out there and paying huge $$$ to get into well known schools and then cutting into demand wherever they may be. It's happening in my field too - Finance. So the morale to all this is, look at your opportunity cost. 6 months at 40% less pay is still better than 6 months with $0 pay... One can always look for work when they are working and gives you more leverage than if you are not working

  • Ra
    Raj
    14 September 2010

    IT is badly paid because employers have sponsored thousands of Indian IT workers who are willing to work for lower rates because they either do it for a few years then go back to India with a lump sum that is huge by Indian standards or are just happy to get some kind of work visa with a goal of PR. These guys are happy to have 10 people sharing a house so have low expenses and low salary expectations, and get Living away from Home allowance reducing their tax payments. knock on effect is low wages for local IT staff who are trying to raise families pay aussie mortgages. Scandalous.
    Lets have 457 visa holders paying more tax than aussie workers and end the LAFHA scheme, its forcing up rents in expat hot spots and cheating the aussie taxpayers. 457 visa holders PAY YOUR way.
    Also put up the salary threshold for the grant of a 457 to $90,000 per annum thus closing the gates for the foreigners that will to do a 90K job for 50K. Sneaky employers wont find it possible to undercut local workers with imports

  • Li
    Lindsay Scott
    14 September 2010

    Yuo don't have to tell your friend anything - 6 months out of work and no doubt more to come should be a wake up call and 6 months is a long time to be bitter about the system. At the moment the market is up and down - up for the right people with the right skillset and down for certain sectors (here in the UK, the public sector is suffering) It's certainly not the right time for demanding 40% pay rises for a job you're not even qualified to do - there's never a right time for that!

    There are many people wanting to get into project management and the competition is tough (there are already good project managers out of work and these will be front of the queue for each new contract that comes up) There is also the issue of salary expectations for career changers - they have a certain level to maintain - but there are no guarantees of hitting the same salary level if you are moving into a brand new profession. As an employer would you pay over the odds for a trainee PM?

    Best Regards
    Lindsay

Sign up to Morning Coffee!

Coffee mug

The essential daily roundup of news and analysis read by everyone from senior bankers and traders to new recruits.

Sign up to Morning Coffee!

Coffee mug

The essential daily roundup of news and analysis read by everyone from senior bankers and traders to new recruits.