Discover your dream Career
For Recruiters

Michael Geoghegan clearly demonstrates how to lose everything by throwing one's toys out of the pram

Threatening to resign is a common technique among the investment banker seeking to improve his/her lot. Given that bonuses this year will probably be modest, it may become more even more common come January.

However, as Geoghegan shows, it is to be used with care.

As chief executive of HSBC, Geoghegan was having a good time. He'd spent forty years with the bank, but only four years' in the very top job. He got 800k a year in allowances and 'benefits in kind' to cover the move to Hong Kong earlier this year, where he's still in the process of doing up a deluxe pad overlooking the harbour at the bank's expense.

In future, Geoghegan also had the prospect of becoming chairman, a role which has traditionally been occupied by HSBC's former chief execs.

Now, however, Geoghegan is apparently retiring at Christmas and won't be chief executive or chairman. Nor will he probably get to live in the special house overlooking the harbour.

According to the Financial Times, it's all because he didn't want work alongside the potentially bossy figure of John Thornton as chairman. Earlier this week, there were rumours that Geoghegan was threatening to throw his pacifier on the pavement and resign unless he got to be chairman and chief exec.

Geoghegan denied that he'd threatened any such thing, but his departure looks a lot like an admission that he did.

His going is good news for HSBC investment bankers, who get to be led by Stuart Gulliver instead. But it's a warning for anyone who thinks that threats, tantrums, prima-donna-ish behaviour, and pacifier lobbing are the way to get ahead. They are not. No one is indispensable.

author-card-avatar
AUTHORSarah Butcher Global Editor
  • Sa
    Sarah, Editor, eFinancialCaree
    11 October 2010

    @Gun. Thanks. How kind.

  • Gu
    Gun
    11 October 2010

    I completely agree with @Nathan. The articles on here are poor, taking, generally, the Daily Mail approach to financial journalism; sensationalist, lacking in nuance, lacking in detail. I've said it before and I'll say it again: the website needs to get rid of Sarah Butcher as Editor and get someone on here that will inject a bit of energy and life into what could be a great website.

  • ro
    rob
    28 September 2010

    @current chap - fair play. Prince William seems to be a little forward on his bashing there

  • Cu
    Currant chap
    27 September 2010

    @rob. Yes - my patience gland for the hateful nerds above. Sad, sad, sad.....

  • Pr
    PrinceWilliam
    27 September 2010

    I come on this site just to read the comments - you always get n*bs like Nathan starting hilarious arguments! I'm going to join in...
    @Nathan - You seem to be a complete c*ck. If you dont like this site, then why dont you go away? Why waste your time logging in and typing non constructive comments. Sarah can write her atricles how she likes. If you dont like it, then as you say, there are substitutes out there! Why dont you just log on to uk.reuters.com instead?! You seem to know where it is! Are you in fact a journalist who is unhappy with their lot, venting at the world? Are you unhappy that you got screwed on your bonus? That your dog dies? that you have a small piece?
    @Ricky - I'm on your side mate.
    @All - lets all pile in and have mass ruckus!

Sign up to Morning Coffee!

Coffee mug

The essential daily roundup of news and analysis read by everyone from senior bankers and traders to new recruits.

Sign up to Morning Coffee!

Coffee mug

The essential daily roundup of news and analysis read by everyone from senior bankers and traders to new recruits.