Discover your dream Career
For Recruiters

GUEST COMMENT: Why the EU's new bonus rules hopefully won't be a big deal

The European Union's new bonus rules have been approved today.

At first glance, they are the most punitive in the world. From January 11, 40 to 60% of bonuses will need to be deferred for three to five years, and only half of the remaining bonus will be paid in cash.

These rules appear to apply to all banks, and to certain investment firms (including hedge funds). They also appear to apply to all risk takers, not just to those in high earning roles. This is in contrast to the FSA's current Code of Practice, which applies only to the UK's 26 largest banks and building societies, and has been operating so that only 40% of bonuses above 500k and 60% above 1m must be deferred.

If the EU rules come into force precisely as they've been worded, they will therefore herald another major reform of compensation in the City.

However, we are hopeful that their impact will be lessened in their implementation. Each EU country has to ratify the new rules and put them into effect. In the UK, this will happen through the FSA, which is due to issue a revised Code of Practice for consultation at the end of this month.

There is no question in my mind that the current EU rules provide room for FSA interpretation. For example, there is a proportionality test allowing the rules to be enforced with differing degrees of rigour depending upon the size and complexity of the organisation. This is effectively EU coding giving individual country regulators leeway in how the new rules are applied.

The FSA has had a history of setting principles and applying them on a case by case basis. I would expect the same to apply to these new EU compensation requirements. It is unlikely, therefore, that hedge funds will need to apply the same rules (for example, to the amount of deferrals) as major banks. Nor will agency brokers, interdealer brokers, or boutiques.

We will only know the true outcome when the revised Code of Practice is issued in the coming weeks. Until then, we're hopeful the outcome won't be as punitive as it seems.

author-card-avatar
AUTHORJon Terry Insider Comment
  • At
    AtLast
    8 July 2010

    Come on, let's face it: these rules are juste common sense! If a trader/asset manager/sales is scared to have a deffered it's because he KNOWS his perf is just bull"*% and he KNOWS he won't receive anything. So, it proves the rules is good, like it or not. If you invest for the medium term, then you don't bother, like i do. It may be time for casino-kind of finance to close the books, and i think it's good news.

  • Do
    Dominic Connor, Quant Headhunt
    8 July 2010

    I'm not sure quite what the past behaviour of the FSA can tell us ?

    The FSA is in effect being abolished and/or merged with the Bank of England, leaving it to pretend that it's doing something useful by chasing insider traders.

    So we can't really say if Jon is right or wrong, since we have almost no basis for working out what the FSA will do. Of course the FSA as never had a much better idea itself.

  • gi
    giles
    7 July 2010

    Either wandering aimlessly around the penalty box or avoiding Wayne Bridge. Terrry Nutkins is next.

  • jw
    jwkt05
    7 July 2010

    Answer: in the sand

  • Ar
    Areyounuts?
    7 July 2010

    Oh... because you really think the political context in this country is favourable to high bonuses in the City. Where on earth have you spent the last 9 months?????????????? Time to land ....

Sign up to Morning Coffee!

Coffee mug

The essential daily roundup of news and analysis read by everyone from senior bankers and traders to new recruits.

Sign up to Morning Coffee!

Coffee mug

The essential daily roundup of news and analysis read by everyone from senior bankers and traders to new recruits.