Discover your dream Career
For Recruiters

The Inbetweener: why recruitment fees can wreck your chances of finding work

Our popular columnist returns with another controversial article. Be sure to leave your comments below.

I was recently in the final stage of an interview process and the subject of money came up. At first I followed the key recommendation in all the interview manuals: never give a price and always let the potential employer start negotiations about what it thinks you are worth.

However, after three back-and-forth conversations I was told to just give the firm a salary figure. So I caved in and I did. I haven't heard back since.

Before that, I had to make the agonising decision about what I thought my annual income should be, so I did some research. I asked people in the industry what the going rate was, and I also checked online to see what the necessary-evil-known-as-recruiters were advertising for similar roles.

The later proved to be the biggest waste of my time. The base rate for standard roles, similar to the one I interviewed for, has a variation of over $40k. The job is not that senior so the big pay gap is bizarre. I deduced this could only mean one thing: there must be a massive gulf between the recruiters' fees.

This is a huge problem for me because it takes me back to my original article of being told that I am too expensive for the position. But perhaps I wouldn't be so costly to the emloyer if the recruiter wasn't taking such a large cut.

Show me the fee

When transactions occur in the financial services sector, clients need to be informed of the fees incurred prior to agreeing to the transaction. So why is it that recruiters don't need to tell you what their cut is for the position YOU are going for?

Since the global financial crisis hit, salaries have dropped, regulations have toughened up for most in the industry, and there is an increased transparency in all transactions, so why don't these rules apply to headhunters? When signing an agreement with a recruiter, I am always told what my obligations are, but I am never informed about the fees.

If we are to learn from the mistakes of the past few years, and want the right people, in the right jobs, at the right salary, then is it time that those salaries are made completely transparent - including the fees for those that put us into our roles in the first place.

Click here

to subscribe to our weekly newsletter.

author-card-avatar
AUTHORAnonymous Insider Comment
  • Fr
    Frank
    10 July 2010

    Recruitment fees have absolutly nothing to do with the candidates.

    Within the banking arena most large banking institutions have preferred rates with the agency therefore whatever your salary is has no effect on the fees and this is kept confidential.

    Further more recruiters spend there time re wording terrible resumes and preparing candidates for interview therefore trying to give the candidate the best possible chance of obtaining the role - this service is FREE.

    Ultimately the hiring descion comes down from the client and whether that candidate has the right skills and attributes for that role which is unfortunately beyond the agency recruiters control.

  • jo
    jordan
    17 June 2010

    If expected salaries were advertised then there wouldn't be this waste of time all around.

  • da
    damien
    17 June 2010

    Recruiters are pompous leeches who will ruin your career fo fun...glad Im not the only one here that thinks they should be done away with.

  • Bo
    Boring
    15 June 2010

    Hey squire, a basic grasp of the English language would probably help with your ambition to become an MD. That and a little bit of humility. Thanks for reassuring me that my career as a recruiter is safe, since it's insulated from attacks by your sheer stupidity. It's alarming that someone with so little intelligence is able to, or interested in commenting on something they know so little about.

  • Sq
    Squire
    14 June 2010

    Yes, Michael, you are soft targets. When I'm MD (I will be coz I'm da bomb) I will be trying to circumvent this no value-add service at all costs. In-house recruitment will continue to grow post GFC. Go to one of the Sandstone Universties, be amongst the top of your cohort at Uni, make one of the ANALyst BB banking programmes then, perhaps, I might give you the respect you deserve (private school pemitting). Yours, Squire.

Sign up to Morning Coffee!

Coffee mug

The essential daily roundup of news and analysis read by everyone from senior bankers and traders to new recruits.

Sign up to Morning Coffee!

Coffee mug

The essential daily roundup of news and analysis read by everyone from senior bankers and traders to new recruits.