Discover your dream Career
For Recruiters

The six habits of slightly unscrupulous recruiters

First of all, a disclaimer. In anticipation of a rush of recruiters seeking to defend their profession, not everyone engaged in recruitment is guilty of the actions below. The very, very vast majority of recruiters are perfectly professional, perfectly pleasant, and perfectly scrupulous.

A spokeswoman for the Recruitment and Employment Confederation (REC) agrees: "It really is the case that the few rather than the many engage in activities contrary to our

code of conduct."

However, it is equally the case that not all recruitment firms are members of the REC and that unscrupulous recruitment practices do occasionally take place. Here's what to watch out for.

1) Sending out multitudes of unauthorised CVs to hiring managers

From a candidate's perspective, the key thing is clearly to ensure that your CV is only sent out in relation to jobs you're actually applying for. From a hiring manager's perspective, the key thing is to ensure that you are not bombarded with CVs you don't particularly want.

Hence one former banker recalls receiving his own CV for a vacancy he was trying to fill. And senior line managers' inboxes are occasionally rendered inaccessible by the receipt of too many emailed CVs.

Unfortunately, it is in recruiters' interest to send out as many CVs as possible. As this recruiter blog post elucidates, once a hiring manager has received a CV from a recruiter, the recruiter is owed a fee if that candidate is placed - now or in the near future.

2) Asking candidates where they're interviewing and pitching alternatives

We've had an interesting debate about this in our Answers area. The truth of the matter is that if a recruiter asks where else you're interviewing, he or she may be doing so out of idle curiosity. Equally, however, he or she may well be fishing for leads. In the latter case, it is almost inevitable that he will get in touch with the line manager in question and suggest some of the other candidates on his books. Evasive action is therefore advisable.

3) Trawling for CVs

The Employment Agency Standards Inspectorate specifies that agencies, "must not place an advertisement, which includes details of positions unless it has information about all the specific positions included in the advertisement; and has been given authority by the hirer concerned to find workseekers for the position advertised."

However, this does not preclude recruiters advertising jobs which don't include any specific details, and which may not exist. By advertising non-specific jobs, recruiters are able to gather CVs, which they can then despatch to banks which might possibly be hiring.

4) Adapting CVs

It's not uncommon for recruiters to adapt CVs to fit their own templates. Spelling and formatting mistakes can be introduced in the process. At the more unscrupulous end of the scale, recruiters may take it upon themselves to compensate for gaps in your employment.

"I had someone on my team who turned out not to have worked for one the employers mentioned on his CV," says one banker-turned-recruiter. "It transpired that he'd been in prison at the time and that the recruiter had covered it up for him."

5) Exaggerating roles

Ensure the recruiter is as specific as possible about the role they're placing you into. If not, you may be disappointed.

"There's an awful lot of sexing-up that takes place," says one recruiter. "For example, if a job description says you will be working 'with' traders, that does not mean that you will be joining a trading group."

6) Trying to poach recently placed candidates

In most cases, a candidate is off-limits for 6-12 months after he/she has been placed; if the recruiter moves them again during this time, the recruiter will be forced to relinquish his fee.

After 6-12 months, however, the candidate can be moved again, for another fee. Expect, therefore, to be contacted by some recruiters frequently. Bear in mind that they may not have your best career interests at heart.

author-card-avatar
AUTHORSarah Butcher Global Editor
  • pe
    peoplebroker
    27 May 2010

    A government website would not work, just as a lot of the time finance job boards do not work. The reason being is that the HR departments simply dont have the time to trawl through all applications from candidates that are not qualified but think they are. Quants applying for trading roles, middle office risk candidates trying to move to the front office without any relevant experience and lets not forget every single person with a JAVA qualification in India hopeful of their big break.....

    The reason why recruitment agents get paid between 20-30% by clients, is to act as a buffer.
    A buffer against 100's of irrelevant CV's and candidates calling and begging already stretched HR departments.
    Its true that some recruiters maybe unscrupulous, but you have to take control of your own career and make sure that this doesn't happen. Speak to them on the phone first before sending a CV and see if they know what they are talking about.
    I dont like to generalise as there are some very p*ss poor HH's out there. Stick to the well known ones (longevity and growth is a good sign that they do have repeat business) and try and speak to people who are senior who specialise in your field

  • Tr
    TraderVic11
    27 May 2010

    I am currently looking for a new role, changing out of trading into something slightly different. Against my better judgement I went along for a role the recruiter put me forward for. Had the meeting etc, and decided it wasn't for me. However as often happens in these situations, the hiring manager really liked me and wanted to "take things forward". I told the recruiter that I wasn't interested and he basically told me that come July there would be a hiring freeze for about 6 months and maybe if I just "took the job for a year to gain experience". Or get a juice commission fee for him per chance?
    They really are up there with estate agents as the biggest load of cowboys I've ever come accross.

  • pa
    pappaeciccia
    27 May 2010

    I dedicate this song to HHs, it is almost friday:

    "I'm a cowboy, on a steel horse I ride
    I'm wanted dead or alive
    Wanted dead or alive"
    ("Wanted Dead Or Alive", Bon Jovi)

  • Th
    The pig
    27 May 2010

    It is clear the recruitment industry is rather parasitic and does not work for either candidates or employees (and I've been at both sides). They only care about their profits. We need something else.
    How's about the government starts a site where all jobs can be advertised for free and employers must advertise at the gov site. This way candidates can find jobs themselves, easily, and maybe even to match their requirements - near home? good commute? companies in their sector? mother-friendly companies? and the 'recruiters' can retrain as plumbers...

  • Ge
    Gene
    27 May 2010

    As a professional recruiter for 20 years, I have experienced all of the negatives that people can say about recruiters. If I can suggest one thing to all, if you find an ethical and honest recruiter, one that will partner with their client and keep their client's interests in the forefront, then keep that recruiter in your fold. They will be a huge benefit to your organization. I do have the privilege of working with a client base in which we enjoy mutual respect and it benefits everyone, our clients, the candidates and us. Many clients do not respect the recruiting relationship and given the nature of the average recruiter, not much respect is earned.

Sign up to Morning Coffee!

Coffee mug

The essential daily roundup of news and analysis read by everyone from senior bankers and traders to new recruits.

Sign up to Morning Coffee!

Coffee mug

The essential daily roundup of news and analysis read by everyone from senior bankers and traders to new recruits.