Discover your dream Career
For Recruiters

It's possible that working in private equity is overrated

Private equity is the holy grail for most junior investment bankers. It is the Waitrose of supermarkets, the Chelsea of London boroughs, the Andrex of toilet papers. It may also be that its advantages are highly exaggerated.

The head of one recruitment firm, who has devoted his life to placing eager young bankers in PE funds (and therefore prefers to remain anonymous for the purposes of this article), says a lot of the analysts and associates who move into private equity have a misguided perspective on its pleasures.

"Everyone thinks private equity is utopia for an investment banker, but in the early days they're really not going to trust you to make decisions that will affect the carried interest of all the senior people working in the fund," he says.

He goes on: "Instead, they're going to have you doing lots of feasibility studies and lots of modelling around different scenarios. There's a huge fallout rate. Expectations are extremely high and they have no qualms about booting you out, especially in the 12-18 months before you become eligible for carried interest."

One comparatively junior private equity professional says it's not that bad: "The work's much more interesting than investment banking - there's no pitching and no marketing. At a senior level, you'll probably also end up spending less of your life on a plane."

The real issue with working in private equity in this day and age appears to be the discrepancy between traditional private equity salaries and the now elevated salaries of investment banking.

It doesn't help that carried interest - the real lure of working in private equity, is harder to come by than it used to be. Many funds only pay out carried interest when the entire fund has been invested and then successfully exited from its investments, a process which can take seven years or more. Even then, carry is only available if a specified hurdle rate is met.

The ideal is working for a fund that pays carry on a deal-by-deal basis, reducing the waiting time. Small cap funds are most likely to offer this arrangement. Failing this, some funds (such as CVC, allegedly), will pay carry based purely on the deals that an individual has worked on - meaning poor returns on colleagues' investments won't contaminate your pay for the next five years or more.

author-card-avatar
AUTHORSarah Butcher Global Editor
  • Sa
    Sam
    17 March 2010

    Is Andrex toilet paper the new toilet paper?

  • an
    anon
    6 March 2010

    its the goldman sachs of goldman sachs

  • Sa
    Sarah, Editor, eFinancialCaree
    6 March 2010

    @Vick_2008 - as you work in banking, you will be aware that any named quotes have to be checked by the press office prior to publication. Named individuals are therefore unable to state anything about pay or say anything adverse about their role or employer. Equally, recruiters and headhunters will and do say things by name about the roles across a sector, but won't say anything about particular firms which are, or may one day be, their clients. Senior headhunters also tend to be averse to discussing pay on the record.It is very rarely that we will publish an article with an unnamed quote whose substance hasn't been verified by several sources.

    If you are willing to provide named quotes regarding your employer, please leave your contact details and we will be in touch.

  • vi
    vick_2008
    6 March 2010

    I like Asda bog roll.. that would be equivalent to efinancialcareers journalism.. Why do these articles revolve around anonymous people making random statements which are irrelevant and unverified..
    With such levels of accountability, I can write articles on NASA's rocket launch leave aside financial job market.. can we pls avoid .. one banker said.. and some anon head of a recruitment firm.. If these guys are the real deal, why dont they express their opinion backed with their names..

  • Be
    BeenAround
    5 March 2010

    The reason why people want to move into PE/HFs is to get away from the c*ap and politics of IB. It is not that they hate modelling or working on transactions BUT working on a transaction that is going nowhere for a deadbeat MD or having to pick up the slack for the cute Spanish girl as none of your geek VP/Directors have the balls to have a strong word with her, that is why people want to leave IB. There is still c*ap and politics on the buyside but you can justify a lot of it (for crying out loud, you are putting money on any decision taken)!

Sign up to Morning Coffee!

Coffee mug

The essential daily roundup of news and analysis read by everyone from senior bankers and traders to new recruits.

Sign up to Morning Coffee!

Coffee mug

The essential daily roundup of news and analysis read by everyone from senior bankers and traders to new recruits.