Discover your dream Career
For Recruiters

Britons need banking and bankers, like it or not

We're a little late on this, but this is a good account of why the British public and the British government are foolish to bash the financial services industry

What follows is a summarised version of an article which appeared on the little known (at least to us) financial services club blog in January. As ever with these things, we've highlighted the most interesting parts....

'The Financial Times has discovered that many City banks and bankers are thinking about upping sticks...

So what does this mean in reality?

The reality is that the UK cannot unilaterally restrict bank bonuses without losing significant tax and income across the UK.

First, if 9,000 bankers leave then that is 9,000 x (salary + bonus). In reality therefore, if each banker earns an average of 2 million or so all up, it's a loss of about 20 billion to the UK economy and taxation of around 5 billion or more.

That's a serious amount of income to the Treasury and commerce across Britain, and London in particular, that disappears up the spout.

But it's more fundamental than this.

If 9,000 bankers leave London, then it is also 9,000 x 4 jobs.

Each banker supports an infrastructure across London of accountants, lawyers, cleaning staff, receptionists, security guards, catering, bars, restaurants and more. All of the support and infrastructure that services their offices and complex negotiations in other words.

So it's more like 36,000 job losses rather than 9,000.

OK, the other 27,000 aren't necessarily earning 2 million a year, but let's say they average 20,000 per year, the UK's average median salary (not London, UK).

This would mean a loss of a further 540 million in income, 100 million plus in taxation and a further 27,000 or more on the unemployed and social security benefit numbers.

Following on from this, wherever the bankers move to will also become a major financial centre and hence other firms might follow paving the way for a mass exodus, in worst case scenario.

In best case scenario, it would just mean that London loses its shine as a Financial Centre, which is threatened already. For example, HSBC has made moves for their CEO to relocate to Hong Kong and is listing on the Shanghai Exchange over the past few months, and many report that Shanghai will outshine London by 2019....

The UK banking sector contributes significantly to the UK and its economy:

* Employing almost half a million people with the wider financial industry employing over 1.1 million

* Together with related activities (accountancy, business, computer and legal services, etc), some three million people rely on the financial industry for their jobs.

* Banks and financial services contribute 70 billion to the UK's national output (6.8% of GDP)

* Banks and financial services provide 25% of total corporation tax (8 billion) to the UK Government

* The value of foreign exchange business passed through London every day is 560bn ($1 trillion)

'

author-card-avatar
AUTHORSarah Butcher Global Editor
  • th
    thammond65
    24 February 2010

    Double counting - the banker's salary is what supports the other jobs in bars etc. What should be considered is wealth creation, and I don't believe that many modern bankers actually create wealth in the way that entrepreneurs, some private equity houses and the best of the commercial bankers do.

  • AN
    A N Alyst
    24 February 2010

    Self-serving claptrap. How about some more numbers:

    1. cost of government support to banking system 850bn
    2. loss of output during recession 100bn
    3. government's likely budget deficit in 2010-11 173bn

    I'm sorry but the costs seem to outweigh the benefits.

  • Eg
    Egghead
    24 February 2010

    @Mark St James: good point about the "lazy uneducated masses". I'm sure your use of "its" instead of "it's" was a deliberate example of the syntax employed by the uneducated masses.

  • Ma
    Mark St James
    24 February 2010

    So true - its election time again and the 80% of the population thats lazy uneducated masses believe everything the media thrashes out. These are also the very people who were greedy about getting a second holiday home, plasma tvs, cars etc that were a significant part of the crisis dont blame themselves do they. Lemmings!

  • Al
    Alex
    24 February 2010

    The article completely misses the point. The public is not angry with bankers because they earn a lot. It is because they earn a lot and either work in public sector (RBS) or their banks are financed cheaply by public money.

Sign up to Morning Coffee!

Coffee mug

The essential daily roundup of news and analysis read by everyone from senior bankers and traders to new recruits.

Sign up to Morning Coffee!

Coffee mug

The essential daily roundup of news and analysis read by everyone from senior bankers and traders to new recruits.