Discover your dream Career
For Recruiters

Another look at the kinds of jobs that will be jettisoned thanks to Volcker

As the dust settles on the vague outlines of the Volcker Rule, we know you will all be very eagerly evaluating its impact on jobs.

Here, following our own perusal of analyst notes and the excellent summaries (and here) provided by Alphaville, is a short analysis of the types of jobs that could be coshed by Volcker, plus those that may actually benefit.

We'll follow this up later with a look at which banks can be particularly expected to cut staff/pay as a result of yesterday's news.

Coshed

1) Dedicated prop traders

As we noted yesterday, this clearly doesn't look good for dedicated prop desks within banks.

The real question is, however, how prop trading is defined, and how much of it banks do. CreditSights' analyst Dave Hendler notes that in the press conference following yesterday's announcement, Austan Goolsbee, chief economist at the Economic Recovery Board emphasized that the rule is not intended as a straight reenactment of Glass Steagall and is not intended to restrict any trading activity related to clients.

As such, any form of prop trading related to market making for clients, should be fine. As we also noted yesterday, most prop trading jobs, which nowadays relate to precisely this, ought therefore to be safe.

Hendler, like most other analysts, emphasizes the extent to which banks have reined in their pure prop activities. At Goldman, they now account for ~10% of revenues; at European banks it's lower than 5%.

"Before the credit bubble burst in 2007, some banks were noting that 20-40% of capital markets revenues were related to in-house hedge funds or prop trading activity," Hendler notes. Most banking prop traders have, therefore, been coshed already.

2) Prime broking

This is a scary thought, particularly as banks have been building up in prime brokerage (particularly in Asia) recently, but the FT points out that according to the Wall Street Journal, under the proposed rule commercial banks would be prohibited from owning, investing in or advising hedge funds or private equity firms.

The implication? Prime broking jobs could be passé too.

3) OTC derivatives desks

Legislation to curb OTC derivatives has been in the pipeline for a while, but yesterday Obama reemphasized his commitment to, to "close loopholes that allowed big financial firms to trade risky financial products like credit default swaps and other derivatives without oversight."

Faster action may be expected on this. Jobs will be created for technologists facilitating the move to exchanges. However, Jobs for traders and salespeople working at the more bespoke end of the OTC derivatives spectrum look threatened.

4) Interdealer brokers

Interdealer brokers like ICAP derive around 20% of their revenues from working with banks' prop desks. The realization of this appears to have sent their stock plummeting this morning. If business with prop desks disappears, so may some of the IDB jobs that relate to it.

And the beneficiares?

There is one clear beneficiary of all this. And that is...

1) Compliance

Given the possibility of avoiding the rule by engaging in client-related activities, expect a lot more effort to go into proving that this is the case. Trading floors can expect a severe uptick in the amount of bureaucrats proving that prop trades are busy working on trades related to customer flow.

author-card-avatar
AUTHORSarah Butcher Global Editor
  • co
    compliancelover
    25 January 2010

    After reading this article - I think I will quit from my prop trading job and go into compliance...

  • Xa
    Xanthus
    23 January 2010

    Here is another clueless article.

    Of course Investment executives are going to say "Henny Penny, the sky is falling in" - it's in their interest to talk their own book up.

    The "Volker rules" won't be abolishing any of these jobs. It will simply mean that the cost of doing these activities will reflect the systematic risk they create, which till now has been borne by the taxpayers (as we all know)

    If these jobs are profitable, they will still be around, but the 'bonus' and remuneration that goes with them will be less, because the bank will need to pay the real cost of these activities.

    And what's wrong with a bank being forced to pay the real cost of its activities - ask any Icelander.

  • wi
    william
    22 January 2010

    Hedge funds are heading for deep trouble. If anything, they will be slashing staff. Have fund working at McDonalds. hahahahaha...

  • tr
    truebeliever
    22 January 2010

    . "Most banking prop traders have, therefore, been coshed already."

    That's not to say those jobs won't be back in say, 10 years time, when the economy is booming again. Obama's future legislation will prevent those jobs from ever coming back.

  • Jo
    Jol
    22 January 2010

    A lot of prop guys are going to leave for hedge funds or start their own, which is in turn going to be good for any support function which can't be outsourced.

    Biggest loser is going to be NYC and the US taxpayer as people relocate elswhere.

Sign up to Morning Coffee!

Coffee mug

The essential daily roundup of news and analysis read by everyone from senior bankers and traders to new recruits.

Sign up to Morning Coffee!

Coffee mug

The essential daily roundup of news and analysis read by everyone from senior bankers and traders to new recruits.