Discover your dream Career
For Recruiters

A stock is trading at $100 and in a year's time it will either double to $200 or halve to $50...

.... ...these are the only two possible states. A survey of investors reveals that 70% think it will double and 30% think it will halve. What is the price of a $100 strike 1year call option on the stock? Interest rates are zero and the stock pays no dividend.

And the answer is:

Most candidates say something like $70 - based on 70% * (200-100). The correct answer is 33.33. this is based on replication. You sell the option for 33.33 and buy 0.6667 of the stock. if the stock goes to $200 then your hedge makes 66.67 and you have received 33.33 so you are square. If the stock halves, your hedge loses 33.33 and you sold the option for 33.33 so you are square. any other price will generate an arbitrage profit.

Additional information

This question is asked during interviews for a senior options trader position

author-card-avatar
AUTHORAnonymous Insider Comment
  • go
    gorgeous george
    29 June 2010

    The_Wisdom_of_Crowds is all very well but I prefer Terry Pratchet's IQ of the Mob:

    The IQ of the Mob is equal to the IQ of its dumbest member divided by the number in the Mob.

    This probably also applies to English Football Teams.... but I have no proof..

  • ca
    carlojan
    16 June 2010

    You can also add that the PUT will have the same price as the CALL since the put call parity

    C(t) + K * B(t,T) = P(t) + S(t)

    C= Call price
    P= Put price
    K= Strike Price (100)
    B= Interest rate (which is 0 in this case)
    S= Spot Price (100)

  • wx
    wxx
    16 June 2010

    Sorry if I came across as a bit of an ar$e in my earlier post. I only write these things to make myself feel more important.

  • Ko
    Kolmogorov
    16 June 2010

    KSG, a senior option trader should work this out in 1 minute, but we are only mortals. In fact, to answer correctly you need to know what an oprion trader does not do: take risks. If he buys an option (because a client wants to sell) he will pay 33.33, borrow 0.6666 of the stock, sell it on the market @ 100 for a gain of 66.66 and deposit with his treasury 33.33 at zero interest rate. He will then carry a net gain of 33.33 to expiry of the option, when he also needs to buy the stock back from the market, give it back to the lender and, finally, pocket the payoff of the option. If the stock goes up, he will pay 133.33 for the stock (200x0.6666), make 100 from the option (200-100) and, finally, "use" the precious 33.33 that he had gained at trade date to offset the loss (=> net gain = 0). If the the stock goes down, he will pay 33.33 from the stock (50x0.6666), make nothing from the option and, again, "use" the precious 33.33 that he had gained at trade date to offset the loss (=> net gain = 0). So what does the trader do in order to benefit the society? (1) anable market making and (2) pay taxes (this part of the answer might be slightly unrelated to the question).

  • Ki
    Kim Jong Il
    16 June 2010

    Yeah good thinking IT guy - you made some good reasoning especially by testing the edge case of 99% real world probability of the stock halving.

    The fact is risk neutral pricing isn't particularly intuitive - most people only understand it if they have studied it in finance or whatever. If you were prepared to sell your options to mr senior options trader for say $30 he'd buy them off you all day long because he knows he can extract $33 from them no mater what happens. :-)

Sign up to Morning Coffee!

Coffee mug

The essential daily roundup of news and analysis read by everyone from senior bankers and traders to new recruits.

Sign up to Morning Coffee!

Coffee mug

The essential daily roundup of news and analysis read by everyone from senior bankers and traders to new recruits.