Discover your dream Career
For Recruiters

The fuss at RBS is over proposed bonuses of 75k a head

The disaster that is the next RBS bonus round has suddenly taken a new turn.

Following this morning's revelation that the government has "seized" the bonus pot, Robert Peston, he with a handle on all things governmental, reported this afternoon that the RBS board plans to resign if the government won't indulge its urge to pay bonuses totaling 1.5bn to staff at 250 Bishopsgate this year.

Peston also says the powers that be at RBS want to elevate the bonus pool to 1.5bn, up from last year's 900m.

While this is a substantial increase, spread across RBS's 19,000 global banking and markets staff, it amounts to a comparatively inoffensive 75k per head.

Last year, the average bonus per head at Goldman Sachs was $160k. This year, it's likely to be more than double that. Needless to say, Goldman Sachs is not 70% owned by the British government, however.

author-card-avatar
AUTHORSarah Butcher Global Editor
  • po
    ponterotto
    7 December 2009

    it's 135 bishopsgate
    head office is 135 not abn's old building - has only a few people in it

  • wa
    wasin
    4 December 2009

    The issue here is that incompetence is being rewarded. RBS senior management have been useless and many are still there because no one would want them. Why pay them anything, let alone a bonus.

  • NB
    NB
    4 December 2009

    @ BullS

    Couldnt agree more. The problem is your average Sun reader doesnt understand this concept and so you get comments from people like 'stillsaynoto75k'

  • Bu
    BullS
    4 December 2009

    Most of the comments here are complete tosh... I wish this site didnt attract so many comments from thicko's... Sarah, please could you come up with a way to root out the stupid users of this site?
    As taxpayers we all own part of RBS. I want the highest return on my stake, which -like it or not- means commercial pay for RBS staff. Either bring pay-caps to all in banking/finance or let the bank I own a part of compete fairly.

  • di
    disgusted
    3 December 2009

    @ joleon

    Get real for a moment will you.

    Career breaks do not hurt careers when there are plenty of jobs around and not many applicants. Career breaks of longer than 12 months can permanently kill a career when there is a shortage of jobs and lots of candidates.

    Lots of bankers will start to feel the pain, both emotional and financial with around 18 months out of market (ie q2 2010) and 6 months of unsuccesful job hunting. Job market will not be hot for another 18 months.

    Let these RBS people leave if they want to. Who said they were any good in the first place.

Sign up to Morning Coffee!

Coffee mug

The essential daily roundup of news and analysis read by everyone from senior bankers and traders to new recruits.

Sign up to Morning Coffee!

Coffee mug

The essential daily roundup of news and analysis read by everyone from senior bankers and traders to new recruits.