Discover your dream Career
For Recruiters

THE ESCAPED ANALYST: Junior investment bankers are not on the minimum wage, but they're close

Back in the days when I was on an analyst programme in an investment bank, a favourite topic for late night conversation in the canteen was whether junior investment banking analysts are worked so hard that they're effectively paid the minimum wage?

Now that I am no longer a junior analyst and have time to contemplate such things, I can safely proclaim that this is just about not the case.

Flexing the numbers

Flexing the numbers conservatively from a 5-50% bonus (adjusted for the 'New Normal'), weekly working hours of 65-130 (about the difference between the most overstaffed and laid back teams [typically corporate finance and ECM,] through to the most overstretched [Industrials, TMT and CEEMEA coverage]), and assuming that a new grunt works a 52-week year and takes home a 41k basic salary [(adjusted upwards for 2009's newly lowered bonus expectations)]...a worst case scenario gives a gross per hour wage of 6.37. The most optimistic outcome pays 18.20.

By comparison, the UK minimum wage is 5.80 per hour for workers aged 22 years and older (which presumably most grads are). In London, the Living Wage (an unofficial figure) currently stands at 7.60 per hour to reflect the higher costs of living in the capital. Almost half (47%) all part-time staff working in London and 15% of full-time workers are still paid below the London living wage. One in seven London employees is paid less than 6.65 per hour.

Of course this analysis is simplistic. It doesn't take into account the fact that banks offer few other employee benefits (pensions, health insurance etc) compared to, for example, corporates or other less glamorous financial services companies. However there's money saved on meals eaten in the canteen, weekend meal allowances, transport costs paid (the taxi home at 1AM) and so on.

McDonalds vs Goldman

The real question is obviously whether it's valid to compare the skillset and educational background of a McDonald's employee with that of someone who's CV passes muster at a bulge bracket investment bank.

I remember, for example, when the cleaners who worked at Goldman Sachs protested about their own low wages outside their offices in Fleet Street, televised live on national TV. These were the same cleaners I watched every night, pretending to work, but actually just pushing a duster around some desks and talking loudly to each other as I sat at my desk in the early hours of the morning, poring over an 80 page presentation.

Why do top shelf graduates submit themselves to this regime, especially given the often much more lucrative roles of the trading floors? Unfortunately, that's a huge question, and one I'll address in my next piece.

author-card-avatar
AUTHORAnonymous Insider Comment
  • sj
    sjoudieh
    12 December 2009

    Guys, interesting thoughts and ideas from all. And there is definitely a future potential in investment banking and that's why people in this business (speaking about myself as well) are willing to put up extra effort and work late ours in the office from time to time. But we really need to value our own time right?? what about health? friends? family? we are humans and our well being is way more complicated than bonuses and working ours and future career and caring about the boss's opinion in us leaving early to get proper sleep!!

  • be
    benblack86
    12 December 2009

    No, Kate, it's you who has failed! The living wage is about getting paid enough to live, which someone on 40k+ can do. What IB are missing out on is a life.

  • be
    benblack86
    11 December 2009

    No, Kate, it's you who has failed! The living wage is about getting paid enough to live, which someone on 40k+ can do. What IB are missing out on is a live.

  • Ka
    Kate
    11 December 2009

    thammond65: 'What nobody points out is that the comparison with the "Living Wage" is false because that assumes a working week of 40 hours'

    No, thammond65, it's you who has failed, because people on hourly wages get hourly wages, i.e. if they work 40 hours or 50 hours they still get paid for each hour. People on monthly salaries are paid a fixed amount monthly and therefore their hourly wage will vary based on how many hours they work. That's the point of this article!

  • th
    thammond65
    9 December 2009

    What nobody points out is that the comparison with the "Living Wage" is false because that assumes a working week of 40 hours. So you all failed the most basic of comprehension tests - typical bloody analysts.

Sign up to Morning Coffee!

Coffee mug

The essential daily roundup of news and analysis read by everyone from senior bankers and traders to new recruits.

Sign up to Morning Coffee!

Coffee mug

The essential daily roundup of news and analysis read by everyone from senior bankers and traders to new recruits.