Discover your dream Career
For Recruiters

Guess what? The Tax may also cover private equity funds, hedge funds and boutiques

As a cheering note with which to end the day, we regret to inform you that The Tax appears to be a lot more wide-ranging than initially reported.

Various news sources have been reporting that hedge funds and private equity were exempt. This may be wishful thinking.

Law firm Withers has issued a report stating that:

As drafted, the proposed legislation will catch family offices, UK investment managers of hedge funds, private equity funds and many more, not just the banks who received financial support (directly or indirectly) from the UK taxpayer.

Samantha Morgan, a London-based solicitor at Withers, says they've fielded numerous calls today from hedge funds, family offices, and boutiques concerned about the tax. "When you look at the press release, it looks like this was aimed at banks, but when you look at what a definition of what a bank is, it's very wide," she says.

The relevant section is on page six of the technical document, and states that it will cover everyone involved in the following activities:

· Accepting deposits (in other words providing current accounts and deposit accounts to retail customers);

· Dealing in investment as principal (in other words trading in derivatives, bonds commodities etc. on their own account);

· Dealing in investments as agent (in other words trading in the above types of investments as behalf of clients);

· Arranging deals in investments;

· Safeguarding and administering investments on behalf of clients; and

· Regulated mortgage contracts (in other words carrying out retail mortgage lending).

One senior corporate financier who's setting up an advisory boutique told us he's spoken to three law firms, two of whom think his business will fall under the new tax.

John Whiting, a tax policy director at the Chartered Institute of Taxation, says there's a possibility the regulation could be amended if it's found to have included businesses which should be excluded.

However, he also says there's a possibility it could be extended beyond April 5th if organizations appear too keen to exploit the loopholes.

"There's an element of, 'If you behave yourselves this will go away, but if there's a lot of scheming, we'll extend it,'" Whiting says.

author-card-avatar
AUTHORSarah Butcher Global Editor
  • Hu
    Humphrey
    11 December 2009

    Actually it seems this is really wide and does catch boutiques because the Treasury is now running around saying they didn't mean it and that they are going to have to rewrite it all!

    In the meantime all the bankers will just be waiting until 6 April when it stops applying to cash in their bonuses and head down to the Porsche showroom a few months later than they would have done.

  • Mr
    Mr Packet
    11 December 2009

    Go away Shazza.

  • sh
    sharon69
    11 December 2009

    haha, about time u paid some taxes bankers. it really is about time that u started giving something back to society and redistributing the wealth. what claim do u have to such ridiculous pay? what can u actually say u did that increased society's productivity? all u did was invent derivatives that not even u understand, which bankrupted society. and now u want a bonus hahaha. this year you will truly realise what a waste of time ur job is (120 hr weeks).
    thank u darling!!

  • An
    Analyst
    11 December 2009

    Indeed, as long as you aren't part of a banking group in the old fashioned sense...

    3 "Taxable company" means a company that-
    (a) is a UK resident bank or a relevant foreign bank,
    (b) is a company not within paragraph (a) that is a member of a banking
    group and-
    (i) is a UK resident investment company or a UK resident
    financial trading company, or
    (ii) is a relevant foreign financial trading company, or
    (c) is a building society or is a UK resident investment company, or a UK
    resident financial trading company, that is a member of the same
    group as a building society.

  • E9
    E97
    10 December 2009

    That's wrong - the document actually states that you have to be carrying out a regulated function within a "Taxable Company". - e.g a doorman at GS is not covered as he is not carrying out a regulated function even though he's at a Taxable Company.

    Its the definition of Taxable Company which is key, not the regulated function. From that its clear that boutiques are not covered as although the individuals may be carrying out a regulated function the firm is not classed as a Taxable Company.

    You need better legal advisers...!!

Sign up to Morning Coffee!

Coffee mug

The essential daily roundup of news and analysis read by everyone from senior bankers and traders to new recruits.

Sign up to Morning Coffee!

Coffee mug

The essential daily roundup of news and analysis read by everyone from senior bankers and traders to new recruits.