Discover your dream Career
For Recruiters

Former Lehman associates allegedly being asked to repay $40k

If the misfortune of selecting Lehman Brothers as your employer straight out of an expensive MBA course weren't enough to deal with, some members of Lehman's associate class of 2008 say they're now being stung for the $40k sign-on bonus the bank paid them when they arrived.

The requests are allegedly coming from PricewaterhouseCoopers, which is administering Lehman's estate in the UK. "More than 60% of my class received this letter around two weeks ago," says one former Lehman associate. "We're seeking legal opinions on whether we have to pay it back."

Another member of Lehman's 2008 associate class alleges that the claims aren't simply for the sign-on itself, but include interest payments and an increment for the depreciation of the pound.

PWC was unable to immediately comment on the veracity of the claims.

One associate admits that the structure of the payment left open the possibility of claiming it back in certain circumstances. "It was structured as a forgiveable loan - if we worked at Lehman for more than a year and didn't quit or weren't fired, we could keep it. If not, we'd have to pay it back."

Given they only worked at Lehman for six weeks before the bank went under, and were then cast adrift with no income and a large MBA loan to support, the decision to retrieve the cash seems a little harsh.

Elaine Aarons, a partners who acts for senior executives at law firm Withers, says PWC might be able to extract the money from the unfortunate associates if the contracts were worded so that the loans were repayable if they simply weren't in employment with Lehman 12 months on.

"Whilst it may seem unreasonable on a common sense basis to have to repay something that you've probably already spent when you have done nothing wrong, it's not impossible that on a strict reading of the contract events have triggered the conditions in which a repayment would occur."

If the wording in the contract is vague, Aarons says the benefit of the doubt will probably lie with the associates: "Any ambiguity is usually construed in the individual's favour."

author-card-avatar
AUTHORSarah Butcher Global Editor
  • le
    lehmanite
    21 November 2009

    they should definitely pay it back. it is owed to the Lehman creditors.

    these people were given the money, and at the time it was clearly documented that this may need to be repaid.

    to say that they shouldn't have to pay it back is almost as absurd as the Irish suggesting that France owe them a replay.

  • Wa
    Walter H
    20 November 2009

    still@lehmann, I'd like to work for whatever remaining parts of the company are still in existence: I'm thinking about B-school and would like the bragging rights of working at lehman AFTER it died......I'm a psych major with EQR internship experience, and I will be taking a more conventional approach to getting an I-Banking job after b school. Until then, I'm looking for the most unusual positions possible, just to get exposure (and plus I'm the first in my family to NOT do Marine Corps: I need something big to justify my existence).

    For real though, I am the deranged workaholic that you want working for you.

  • ju
    jude
    20 November 2009

    epic fail

  • le
    lehman blows
    20 November 2009

    still@lehman: you're a moron. we all saw what was happening to the firm but had to adhere to our offer or our schools would shut us out of future recruiting/alumni networks. No one had that money to repay as well, since the majority of us used it towards our loans. And most thought the firm would be saved, similar to Bear. Oops.

  • m
    m
    20 November 2009

    is this for associates only?

Sign up to Morning Coffee!

Coffee mug

The essential daily roundup of news and analysis read by everyone from senior bankers and traders to new recruits.

Sign up to Morning Coffee!

Coffee mug

The essential daily roundup of news and analysis read by everyone from senior bankers and traders to new recruits.