Discover your dream Career
For Recruiters

The graduate recruitment immigration headache

As if securing a position on an investment banks' graduate scheme wasn't difficult enough, the UK's points-based immigration system is providing an extra stumbling block for students applying from outside the EU. And, we understand, banks are having to reduce their quota of non-Europeans as a result.

The new points-based immigration system was introduced last year in a bid to both safeguard jobs for British workers and to make it easier for those with skill-sets in short supply locally to make it through UK borders.

"An employer wishing to issue a certificate of sponsorship to an employee outside the EU is now subject to stringent record keeping requirements, so if they're audited they can justify why they issued these, rather than tapping the resident labour market," says Caron Pope, head of immigration at law firm CMS Cameron McKenna.

According to recent reports, the new system is leading to bottlenecks in graduate recruitment, internships and training schemes. And, the i-banking graduate recruiters we spoke to said they'd been forced to restrict non-EU candidates to around 10% of the total intake this year.

Pope adds: "If firms want to offer a position to somebody from outside the EU, they essentially have to prove that nobody else is right for the role apart from this individual. Clearly, this is difficult when you're a graduate without a huge body of experience or specific skills behind you."

But, in this day and age, it's impractical for internationally-focused firms like investment banks to be so restricted in the types of people they're able to take on, so they are likely to address this in the long-term.

Pope tells us that most large multi-national firms are registering with the UK Border Agency - the government entity which controls immigration - to sponsor of migrant workers. In practice, this means firms will have to jump through more regulatory loopholes, such as stricter record-keeping around HR practices and restrictions on where they can place job ads. However, most would be willing to do this in order to recruit the right candidates.

The current problem, though, is the lack of clarity around exactly what the rules are.

Neil Carberry, CBI head of employment policy, told the Financial Times: "There is growing frustration that rules are getting changed pretty much on a weekly basis; and there is frustration about visa delays."

"In previous years we have focused on language skills around and knowledge of emerging markets, particularly Russia and the Middle East," adds one head of graduate recruitment at an international investment bank. "The new laws have limited this somewhat."

author-card-avatar
AUTHORPaul Clarke
  • La
    Laughs
    3 February 2010

    As an international student, I paid a lot to study here. No one is taking ur jobs as we have to work twice as hard to prove ourselves in this country so i dont see anything wrong with 2 years PSW. Thanks Touseef for ur comment, sick and tired of hearing peeps complaining about foreign workers, not like we are charity cases, we do contribute to the economy and all!

  • Da
    David
    21 November 2009

    Whilst I am sympathetic to UK nationals who have to face increased competition for the coveted IB jobs, I am against setting quotas for non-EU candidates. Coming from a country which has a history of setting quotas (Malaysia), I have firsthand experience and a bird's eye view of its long term effects. Free labour market movement is essential to ensure UK remains competitive and attract the best talents. Candidates should be awarded positions base on their capabilities, not their nationalities. Once you talk about setting quotas, A students from non-EU countries are denied the jobs they should be getting and B students from the EU are given the jobs. In the long run, the B students who get promoted through the ranks will start hiring C students for fear of hiring people who are better than them. I have seen this happen in university admissions systems, in businesses both small and large, in government organisations, as well as the government itself. A students only like working with A students, once you start letting the B students in, they start hiring the C students. Meritocracy is the only way forward.

  • ti
    tintin
    16 November 2009

    This is the thing that ticks me most that all things bad are blamed on the immgirant ohohoh they are taking our jobs. Look guys you need 2 wake up 2 the realty the world is changing there is competition every were you look and the nany state where you are garenteed positions is over. You have to demonstrate you can out perform the competition.Just an example i have a friend who is white british and he did french at un and he wanted to get into investment banking and he couldnt get in because he did the wrong degree. Now this is an example of how most of these companies hire the immigrant student because he goes to unversity and study what he intends to do with the degree while you guys go to un have a jolly go time studying languages and i will chose what to do after un. That is how same of you guys are missing out and as for the immigration rules that is how the government will behave mostly after allowing a lot of europeans in the best target for them is the non eu students what they dont realise is that they are turning all those students to countries like canada, australia, newzeland ect after being educated in britain what a brain drain that is wake up guys realty has arrived

  • SH
    SHUKA
    2 November 2009

    I am a finance enthusiast, for me finance is the air I need really go at it. The reason most international students aspire for jobs in London, is that London is really where the action is, if you want to play hard ball, that is the place to be. We learn about all these things that we do not even have in our countries such as swaps, and derivatives. Secondly, when coming from a country with a weak currency, getting a job that pays in Stirling Pound helps to pay for the loans, otherwise you are stuck in a job that will not pay for the loans within 10 years. Thirdly, London is just a beautiful city, and I yearn to wake up in that rainy city. If it was only for the money, I would get a voice trainer, and be a musician right here at home.

  • @D
    @ Dina
    28 October 2009

    I am a non-euro student. Work experience in the UK is highly valued in my own country (i.e. working here 3 years might put me in the same position as someone who working in my home country for 6 years). It makes more sense working here before returning to contribute. As you can see, it has nothing to do with immigration. Most of us want to go home in the end.

Sign up to Morning Coffee!

Coffee mug

The essential daily roundup of news and analysis read by everyone from senior bankers and traders to new recruits.

Sign up to Morning Coffee!

Coffee mug

The essential daily roundup of news and analysis read by everyone from senior bankers and traders to new recruits.