Discover your dream Career
For Recruiters

Do you support the exec pay proposals?

What do you make of the Productivity Commission's recommendations on executive pay? Too harsh, about right, or not tough enough?

The two most controversial recommendations were: 1) the "two strikes and a spill" rule, whereby two successive negative votes of 25 per cent or more on pay would result in a company's entire board facing re-election; and 2) the removal of the right of companies to vote undirected proxies to executive pay policies.

Does the former strengthen the power of shareholders too much?

Bankers will be pleased, however, that the commission did not advocate salary caps.

CBA chief executive Ralph Norris, commented: "Shareholders do get the ability to vote on the remuneration report. I don't make the decision on what I'm paid. That's the decision of the board. However, I don't think there should be a cap on salaries, it is better to have it linked more to performance."

What's your take on the report? Does it achieve a good balance between executive and shareholder interests?

author-card-avatar
AUTHOReFinancialCareers Australia Insider Comment
  • Ke
    Kevin Johnson
    15 October 2009

    There is no way I would agree that the board should be able to use absentee proxy votes to support their own remuneration in whatever shape it is proposed. This practice should be stopped altogether.

  • to
    toby
    8 October 2009

    World leaders on Friday buried their differences over bankers' bonuses, agreeing to back new global standards for financial pay schemes and require banks to build up their capital bases if necessary by reducing pay-outs.

    http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/b...

  • ja
    jack
    8 October 2009

    Not capping salaries and bonuses was proven ineffective in the past. All banks globally are looking at cappping salaries and bonuses. So I do not think there is problem in terms of global competitiveness. Funds from exorbetant bonuses and salaries can be used instead to fund the growth of the company and use to pay new hires. Capacity to grow is one of the major reason why the financial crisis happened.

  • ga
    garyJ
    1 October 2009

    "two strikes, you're out" complicates things too much and leaves companies open to internal warfare. This is not the way for Australian banks, or any other companies for that matter, to remain globally competitive.

  • de
    des
    1 October 2009

    How a bank uses its own resources should be up to its own board.

Sign up to Morning Coffee!

Coffee mug

The essential daily roundup of news and analysis read by everyone from senior bankers and traders to new recruits.

Sign up to Morning Coffee!

Coffee mug

The essential daily roundup of news and analysis read by everyone from senior bankers and traders to new recruits.