Discover your dream Career
For Recruiters

Economists are it

Suddenly, economists are HOT. As we reported earlier this week, global macro hedge funds are said to be hiring. And Citigroup has apparently told investors to follow the pronouncements of its economists rather than its equity analysts if they want to call the end of the bear market.

Does this mean that economists are receiving more recruitment calls? Sadly not.

"It's very slow," says one senior economist at a European bank.

"It's a macro moment, and demand for what we have to say has clearly gone up," says another.

However, he's hesitant to call a hiring rush without drawing up a few charts: "The market for economists is probably holding up better than for other financial services professionals, but it would be hard to say for certain without looking at some stats..."

Lee Thacker of search firm Silvermine Partners says economist jobs tend to be few and far between anyhow. "There are only one or two chief economists at each bank. They tend to come from academia and to stay in their roles for a very, very long time."

author-card-avatar
AUTHORSarah Butcher Global Editor
  • St
    Statistician
    15 March 2009

    Pete, don't forget that economics is probably the only subject where models and theories are still taught and studied even if they are clearly utterly wrong! In all other disciplines, when a model doesn't even come close to explaining the facts, it gets scrapped, but not in economics!
    Also, it's not true that economics involves that much maths, and, most importantly, that so much maths is really useful. In my experience many economists brag about their understanding of maths and statistics because they know a tiny bit more than their colleagues who study business, but this makes them no experts. Many papers in economics, for example, still confuse p-values with error probabilities, a huge cause of laughter for true statisticians! But the point is: are all those apparently intimidating formulas really useful? Do they really explain economic behaviour or are they just a way to show off? The latter, as facts have proven...

  • an
    ankit
    15 March 2009

    I do agree with Pete Talks. Almost every financial co. was hiring for analysts. & probably that's what led to the current disaster. The recruiters should have had some economics thinktank to see where the decisions of analysts are heading.

  • Re
    Realistic
    13 March 2009

    I think everyone should be listened to. Economist, analyst etc...independently and then gather the info and make the more relevant scenario. I was surprised when discussing with a paper from 2005 in my actual AM company stating that the average price of houses was dangerously coming to the average income limit in the US. It was not saying when but is was clearly saying that it wasgoing to blow. Easy to predict, but it helped the company not to invest AT ALL in US RMBS. Helpful nowdays. We surely have other things though... ;-)

  • bl
    blad
    13 March 2009

    I dont think the above is the real Henry ..

  • Pr
    Prasad1010
    13 March 2009

    Oi henry i ave a degree in sociology from soton uni, i aint cumplainin cos i got me into da spread betting world. eco aint nuffin, and oxford uni is rubbish man. only losers go there who cant get any.

Sign up to Morning Coffee!

Coffee mug

The essential daily roundup of news and analysis read by everyone from senior bankers and traders to new recruits.

Sign up to Morning Coffee!

Coffee mug

The essential daily roundup of news and analysis read by everyone from senior bankers and traders to new recruits.