Discover your dream Career
For Recruiters

GUEST COMMENT: Family offices are the future

What with stricken hedge funds and uncertainties surrounding even the most established private banks, the richest of the rich are increasingly forming their very own offices.

Working for a family office has its advantages. Families make their own rules and look to recruit only the crème de la crème of talent. The aim is typically to protect and create greater fortune for their family progeny. Succession planning is high on the agenda above. Ensuring their wealth endures the next generation, and beyond, is of primary concern.

While most private banks are interested in hiring bankers who can bring transferable assets, the principal interest of family offices is therefore in hiring individuals with specialised knowledge of investment strategies and financial products.

If you want to work in a family office, it will also help if you are able to introduce one wealthy family to another. Family offices are extremely costly to set up and multi-family structures are increasingly popular. If you are able to 'bolt-on' other families' wealth to be managed centrally, it will certainly make you a more appealing hire.

Taking a multi-family office across geographical borders (as seen in the US and Europe) also requires local expertise in new markets. The service model must be able to navigate multiple currencies, jurisdictions and regulations. Geographical location therefore has a big pull on the purse strings, particularly in small independent states such as Monaco and Liechtenstein where taxation is low but the cost of living is high. Many families will be looking for individuals with the right regional experience.

For talented investors who match this criteria, family offices will increasingly be the place to be. Although many families are risk averse, regulation is minimal and although pay may disappoint former hedge fund managers, it can be comparable with private banks.

author-card-avatar
AUTHORSophie DeFerranti Insider Comment
  • UH
    UHNWI
    17 March 2009

    On the rock - ever thought what your pseudonym rhymes with? You're clearly bitter, frustrated and unpopular - and fat and ugly.
    Get back in your box.

  • on
    on the rock
    7 February 2009

    Though your placements may now all be signing on or in the world of want-fries-with-that do not assume all on this site are unemployed. Do assume that a few people out there were on the other side of the mindless longs that came undone. Some of us may even have done rather well. And as for the constructive debate you raise some points that appear unsupported and feel free to answer the questions raised. As for the picture I assume this is a Jackie Collins tribute. though clearly distracted some other posters.

  • So
    Sophie De Ferranti
    6 February 2009

    It's good to see that the IB redundancy packages are being put to good use. I would like to thank all gentleman (and I assume you are) concerned for your highly constructive and relevant contributions to the Family Office debate. Bravo.

  • tr
    trek102
    6 February 2009

    OK, here is a thought: we need some distraction before the weekend. I suggest we get Sophie in for a webcast on waterskiing and FOs, should be a 10minute live presentation on FOs and maybe a 20min demonstration on watersking.

  • De
    De Ferranti
    6 February 2009

    oi!
    Thats my wife!

Sign up to Morning Coffee!

Coffee mug

The essential daily roundup of news and analysis read by everyone from senior bankers and traders to new recruits.

Sign up to Morning Coffee!

Coffee mug

The essential daily roundup of news and analysis read by everyone from senior bankers and traders to new recruits.