Discover your dream Career
For Recruiters

Outsourcing set to surge in 2009

An increasing number of technology roles within banks are likely to be outsourced in 2009, as banks look for ways to slash costs.

Outsourcing of technology by financial firms will surge by 8% globally in 2009, according to forecasts from consultancy IDC Financial Insights.

The prediction forms part of its annual industry overview, which also suggests that banks will spend by 3.2% less on IT this year - the first contraction since Financial Insights began tracking budgets in 2002. To make matters worse, it predicts spending in the securities industry will experience the sharpest fall - slumping by 9.9% in the next 12 months.

Jeanne Capachin, VP banking at Financial Insights, says: "As financial institutions renegotiate contracts and vendors become more competitive to win new business, overall prices will decline, but volumes of new business in outsourcing will increase."

Financial Insights says that business process outsourcing (BPO) and transactions processing outsourcing are on the agenda this year, but this could just be the tip of the iceberg.

Nick Mayes, senior consultant at Pierre Audoin Consultants, reckons banks will look to outsource IT infrastructure and that any expansion of data centres is likely to be taken on by third-party suppliers.

He adds: "Banks are looking more and more at packaged applications rather than customised in-house developed systems, and we'll see an increased use of application management and maintenance from third-party organisations."

In December, IBM signed a big ticket deal with Friends Provident, worth 200m, to provide infrastructure services over ten years. Friends Provident expects to save 6m a year.

Citigroup, meanwhile, last week sold its BPO unit to Indian software services provider Tata Consultancy Services for $512m. Fidelity made a similar move in mid-December.

Financial Insights says a growing number of financial firms will follow in their footsteps this year due to the increasing costs of running these functions.

author-card-avatar
AUTHORPaul Clarke
  • je
    jerry steve
    4 February 2009

    If I am a biz man and I get 2 managers and 10 developers and 2 testers offsite for the cost of 2 developers onsite. then i would prefer outsourcing, boss this is business, only monmey counts.. many people in the so called '3rd world ' companies are also fired and loose jobs in one way or other because of recession and stuff....
    EOD only biz counts.. in casesome one sees less quality its just an excuse lesser quality can be anywhere and at any itme..

    now, all biz needs to go on onsite off shore model to save costs....

  • dd
    dd
    26 January 2009

    outsourcing is a tool not a solution.

    it can work well in support-type roles.

    it fails spectacularly in devel-type roles.

    banks' preferred IT dept structures and politics also fail for devel-type roles. but on average in a manner less likely to blow-out financially. and intermittently, decent devel work _can_ happen despite the environment. (altho this typically is confined to the quant desk or by contractors.)

  • Sy
    Sydney
    26 January 2009

    Outsourcing comes in and out of fashion depending on the economic times. I have been a contractor, and I worked MORE hours than the regular employees. You can't generalise about contractors. Yes, they are paid more - but they are very expendable and usually the first to go when cuts are made, which is WHY they are paid more. Outsourcing is not the blanket answer - sometimes is is crucial for the team to be on one site working together and offshoring work is a bad idea. Sending IT and other work offshore is highly overrated anyway. And it's not necessarily about the school, it's about the person. Some people who are very good can't afford to attend a top uni... or even go at all. Remember, there are a lot of people who are great successes in business without a uni degree.

  • Hi
    Hitesh
    25 January 2009

    I think people need to be balanced in whether to outsource certain functions. Certain small jobs where not much of technical assistance is required (like processing jobs) should be outsourced, keeping the core activities inhouse. Also if people think that there are not enough quality coming from the 3rd world degrees, then qualified people from the UK should be deputated to those countries and train people to be upto the standards as required. This is more sound for long term benefits. There are certain benefits and ill effects of outsourcing. But at the end of the day outsourcing is a profitable venture.

  • Ja
    James
    25 January 2009

    The IT outsourcing should not be increased, simply because the technical skills of the outsourcing comapnied(espeically those in India) is not good enough for mission critical systems.

Sign up to Morning Coffee!

Coffee mug

The essential daily roundup of news and analysis read by everyone from senior bankers and traders to new recruits.

Sign up to Morning Coffee!

Coffee mug

The essential daily roundup of news and analysis read by everyone from senior bankers and traders to new recruits.