Discover your dream Career
For Recruiters

TRANCHED: Pity the poor recruiters

2008 is over from a recruitment point of view. December is going to be a very dead month. I get the feeling that there is a general mood of exhaustion in the market and that many people are going to wait until the fresh new year before reassessing things.

I did an ugly calculation this week. I divided the amount of cash I now have readily available by my monthly expenditure to see just how long before this drama really does turn into a crisis. The answer quantified the challenges ahead: although I am not going to starve in the next couple of years, it has certainly brought matters into sharp focus.

I've begun making cuts. The gym membership went months ago; other good-time essentials have been cut right back. Friends say this level of belt tightening is going on across the board. At first, I relished the idea of cutting back and penny pinching. Now that it's become essential, it's starting to feel a bit bleak.

The short-term consulting role I've taken on may yet bear fruit. However, these are volatile times and work that looked set in stone has often drifted as budgets are cut and internal resources are thrown at the problems. From a bank's point of view, that's fully understandable, but it means that work has been fairly slow. And as I get paid for time spent on site with clients the money has yet to appear.

In the meantime, I've kept on pushing contacts and headhunters to try and get all things career-wise back on track. I met a new headhunter this week and the conversation followed a fairly familiar pattern: small talk, the revelation that the advertised role has gone but there might be other roles soon, and so on. Time after time we dance the merry jig.

I'm not blaming headhunters for this. I appreciate the difficult conditions they face at the moment and their desks are probably groaning under the weight of CVs from displaced bankers.

The situation for recruiters now is very different to that before the market dislocation. Then, their calls went unanswered. Now, those same bankers are filing through their doors expecting them to magic a job out of thin air. Friends and acquaintances who have recently joined the list of the underemployed moan about unanswered emails and the lack of call-backs. The truth is that the jobs-to-candidate ratio is so hugely out of kilter that most new meetings with candidates are simply a matter of paying lip service, hoping for the better times to return.

Many would question the sanity of continually banging my head against brick walls. However, to do so would be to misunderstand the situation. In this market, no avenue can be left unexplored. A half-hour chat with a recruiter or a contact is always worthwhile, even if both parties know that they are just going through the motions.

Time is a commodity that is plentiful at the moment. Keeping as many balls in the air as possible will greatly enhance the chances of some positive outcome to this process. In the meantime, I am pushing to win business for the consultancy. It really is attack on all fronts. Needs must when the devil drives.

author-card-avatar
AUTHORCDO Joe Insider Comment
  • Re
    Recruitment
    19 November 2008

    I agree with Jonnybgood, the amount of direct applications are on average 90% irrelevant to the job which they are applying for. That's what we recruiters are here for, to separate the wheat from the chaff and ensure that applications are true to the specifications from the client.
    With regards to M&A's sweeping statement, if there are agencies out there advertising fake jobs, if this is the case then I wouldn't be surprised if they went bust before the curtain closes on 2008.
    In times like these, for the candidate it's important to stay as close to your recruiter as possible and remind them that you are still on the market.
    Good luck.

  • ch
    christianald
    18 November 2008

    I beg to differ. I'm standing by my comments and real life experiences, and I'll repeat that again - "real life experiences", not something read out of a book whilst at university. Another thing you FAIL to mention, it is the nice, fat juicy commission you get out of "brokering deals between 2 given parties". Ha! Conveniently missed that little fact out didn't you!! I remember a consultant boasting to me down the phone that "recruitment was a lot of fun, and very lucrative". To be fair though, if that is the REAL Henry, at least you have the decency to admit you work for a search firm!!

  • He
    Henry
    18 November 2008

    in response to Christianald - Why don't people buy houses directly from the owners and cut out estate agents or why don't people selling ships and cut out the shipbroker etc. I'll tell you why, it is for the simple reason that the 'middlemen' are paid to know their market and broker deals between 2 given parties. I work for a reputable search firm, many people here are ex market themselves and we never advertise fake jobs! We are here to provide a genuine service. Of course candidates can go directly to companies but good luck with your direct applications to companies that may or may not be hiring and hopefully your CV will not go by unnoticed in HRs intray. We can use our relationships to promote candidates we feel are of the right standars to our clients for specific roles. At the end of the day we get paid for a successful placement so it is a waste of our time advertising fake jobs and meeting with people that 'may' be of use in the future. I want to meet with good people relevant to the roles i am working on..

  • ch
    christianald
    17 November 2008

    One other thing - covering letters! I clearly recall being told by a consultant not to worry about the content because they "never read them anyway", and if you are using a 2-page CV, they NEVER bother reading the second page. Consultants/Head Hunters (can someone please explain the difference??) have a lot to answer for in my book, too bad the financial crisis hasn't sorted them out...

  • ch
    christianald
    17 November 2008

    Sorry, but I have to say that I agree with M&A. The recruitment and headhunting industry is a complete sham, I have come across numerous instances of fake jobs being advertised, bogus salaries (or salaries being completely made up during interviews - contrary to ads), consultants literally calling up and reading a job spec down the phone (about roles that they quite obviously don't have a clue about). I could go on, but I'm not going to. I always apply directly to companies, then at least you only have to deal with them and not a consultant.

    I love how they threaten "not to forward your CV for the role"....haha - trying to hold me to ransom, I don't think so. My advice would be only deal with them if you have to, otherwise forget it.

Sign up to Morning Coffee!

Coffee mug

The essential daily roundup of news and analysis read by everyone from senior bankers and traders to new recruits.

Sign up to Morning Coffee!

Coffee mug

The essential daily roundup of news and analysis read by everyone from senior bankers and traders to new recruits.