Discover your dream Career
For Recruiters

Bad omen for Nomura bankers

First they had to tolerate the arrival of 2,500 Lehman bankers on inflated guarantees. Now Nomura's existing staff are being asked to take orders from their uninvited guests.

On Friday, Nomura revealed that ex-Lehmanites Christian Meissner and William Vereker are to be heads of investment banking for Europe, the Middle East and Africa, and that Glenn Schiffman will head Asia-Pacific investment banking, based in Hong Kong.

The appointments are said to be another move to keep Lehman bankers on side, but may do more to alienate Nomura bankers who are already said to be peeved at the generous packages on offer to the new arrivals.

With losses of 148bn in the global markets division in the first half of 2008, there's also a strong possibility that Nomura will need to trim costs in the not too distant future. Headcount was to be reduced by 700 during the integration process anyway; if more cuts become necessary legacy staff now look certain to suffer most.

The good news for Nomura bankers is that headhunters say this is unlikely to happen: the Lehman people are keen to leave the instant guarantees have been paid out.

"You're going to see a lot of natural fallout from Nomura in March/April when the Lehman people get 70% of their first payout," says one. "Redundancies won't be necessary."

Nomura typically pays considerably less than Lehman. Last year, the average European employee at Nomura earned 156k, against 205k for the average Lehman banker globally.

The bad news is that unless things pick up by spring (unlikely), former Lehman bankers won't have anywhere to go to. If so, sticking with Nomura will seem distinctly appealing and Nomura bankers may yet find themselves displaced permanently.

author-card-avatar
AUTHORSarah Butcher Global Editor
  • An
    Anon
    25 November 2008

    I think that certain quarters of Lehman do display unacceptable arrogance and that we (ex-Lehman) have a lot to learn from Far Eastern culture - humility, deference, respect, etc. It was, afterall, the arrogance in certain parts of the bank that brought it down - no question at all about that. I imagine that the greater an individual's arrogance, the greater the likelihood of his / her departure post March '09 and the fewer of those guys on board the smaller the chance of a repetition of the behaviour that has resulted in this crisis.

    The Nomura acquisition of parts of Lehman was a brave move and there are many here at ex-Lehman that respect that and are doing their utmost to make the new venture succeed.

  • An
    Anonymous
    21 November 2008

    It is understandable to an extent that there is an anti-Lehman concensus. However it is important to note that the Equities and Investment Banking divisions, that were taken over by Nomura, were neither responsible for bringing the bank to its knees, nor the global banking crisis, and associated losses. These were both profitable areas of the business and were market leading in terms of product, people and technology, which is why their value was bought by Nomura. As for compensation packages, the guarantees are not across the board and none are longer than 1 year.

  • Re
    Reverse Takeover
    20 November 2008

    If it is true Nomura made only 10% of what LB was making a day - as someone suggested in a previous post - perhaps that is because Nomura was never in the business of selling absolute crap to clients without any scrupules in the first place. In many parts of the world you'd better not even whisper you're ex-Lehman, or else bereft and desperate clients, mini-bond victims and other people who saw their lifelong savings disappear thanks to these overleveraged cowboys, will go at your throat. At least 'old' Nomura could look its clients straight in the eyes and the much ridiculed conservativeness of Japanese financials was gaining more sympathy throughout a world, that is increasingly fed up with US investment banks' style and talent to screw things up. That said and given the very generous lifeline provided to them in times of massive layoffs, these guys could at least show some appreciation and acknowledge that LB never even came close to Nomura's traditional stronghold in Japanese equities. It's a shame they're allowed to hand out their new cards carrying Nomura's name, while boasting still how they did everything so much better at Lehman. Who got bust in the first place?

  • je
    jealous
    18 November 2008

    I think the Lehman guys had nowhere to go and the Nomura deal was a godsend. They were way overpaid for where they were and could have been brought on board for probably a quarter of what they have got and still been grateful to their new masters.

  • Je
    Jeremiah
    13 November 2008

    I know of some very ordinary fixed income guys working in Emerging markets that have gone from Lehman to Nomura, hope they're not getting a guaranteed payout.

Sign up to Morning Coffee!

Coffee mug

The essential daily roundup of news and analysis read by everyone from senior bankers and traders to new recruits.

Sign up to Morning Coffee!

Coffee mug

The essential daily roundup of news and analysis read by everyone from senior bankers and traders to new recruits.