$40m for five months: has Merrill overpaid for Montag?
Has John Thain been too kind to his old Goldman buddy, Thomas Montag?
According to Bloomberg and various other news sources, Merrill's paying Montag a $600k salary plus $40m for the five months' work he does between now and the end of the year. It's also alleged to have compensated him for the $50m of stock options he forfeited when he left Goldman.
Merrill Lynch can ill afford such lavishness. Last week it agreed to sell CDOs with a face value of $30.6bn for a mere 22 cents on the dollar. In mid-July it posted a $4.9bn Q2 loss following an earlier $9.4bn of writedowns.
What does Montag bring to this troubled table? According to Bloomberg, he tripled Goldman's Japanese profits in two years. In the hope that he'll be able to repeat that magic on a larger scale and in a far more hostile environment, Merrill reputedly delayed making strategy and staffing decisions until Montag arrived yesterday.
Is Thain wrong to pin so much on one individual? Should Merrill have stuck with an insider to resolve its problems? And can anyone seriously merit that kind of money? Let us know below.