Ageism - one banker's personal perspective
After 30+ years plus in global custody and middle-office operations, it seems to me ageism is still rife in financial services.
Over the years, I've dealt successfully with various employment agencies as an employer. However, when the boot is on the other foot and people of my age are looking for a job, it's a different story.
Positions are advertised on various job sites which I know for a fact I can do standing on my head. Why is it, then, that I keep getting the response, "Sorry, but you have not got the experience"?
Could it be the agencies are afraid to talk to banks' HR departments, and to say they have a very experienced candidate to send through?
First contact with agencies is always fantastic. They make you feel good and say: "Great CV, you certainly match the criteria of our clients' needs. We'll send off your details and follow them up in a couple of days, give you the feedback and hopefully organise an interview."
Such a reponse makes the adrenaline flow and makes you think that you might be on your way back to the fast lane where you belong. It's around then that I usually start thinking about the role, what systems they've got, what procedures are in place and so on.
However, after a couple of days and no messages from the agency concerned, it's time to call them. Eight out of 10 times you cannot contact the person dealing with your case file: once you give your name they seem to go into hiding. They're always either in a meeting, away from the desk or on the phone - and they very seldom call back.
If you are lucky enough to get your man a couple of days later, you'll invariably find out that you're "not experienced enough", that the role was "too junior", or some other excuse.
This is why there are so many people of my age (55 and a born-again teenager) out there, with a wealth of experience which cannot be gained within two to three years.
Give us veterans a chance and the major players could well be surprised in landing a genuine, experienced and passionate person for their empire. That person will reward them for a good few years to come - rather than resigning after one or two years for another position offering more money.
All I want is a fair break. Who will change employers' and agencies' opinions on this?