Discover your dream Career
For Recruiters

Headhunting heads to roll?

Back in 2002 and 2003, financial services headhunters cut staff to the bone. Is history about to repeat itself?

Not according to so-called 'search to search' firms who headhunters use to fill their own vacancies and whose business it is to know such things.

"I don't think we are going to see mass redundancies in the way we did in 2001 and 2002," says John Matheson at Strata Search. "Firms will cut poor performers and move people working on areas like debt across to the Far East, but it's not going to be wholesale cutting."

"There's less overcapacity now than there was six years ago," confirms Ed Bathgate at Longbottom. "Search firms now are much leaner than they were - hiring over the past few years has not been particularly aggressive."

Some of the biggest cuts in 2001 came at Heidrick & Struggles, which sliced 50 financial services staff including 15 consultants from its London, New York and Hong Kong offices. Heidrick has since merged with Highland Partners, adding to its consultant numbers.

Search to search types say the hottest headhunters in 2008 will be those specializing in M&A, equity derivatives, emerging markets and commodities, and that some people in these areas are already receiving multiple job offers.

By comparison, structured credit specialists are predictably unappealing, but the headhunters of headhunters insist earning power in that area isn't about to bomb. "Good structured credit billers who brought in more than 1m this year are looking at billing 400-500k next year," says Matheson. "There is going to be a slowing in that area, but the feeling is banks will still be hiring."

Matheson adds that a partner-level consultant in a top search firm can expect a salary of 150k, with bonuses typically allocated according to revenues - once a consultant has billed to two three times his/her base salary, bonuses rise from 30% to 70% of subsequent production.

author-card-avatar
AUTHOReFinancialCareers UK Insider Comment
  • An
    Anon
    11 December 2007

    If headhunters have a bad reputation is not our fault, but it's headhunters' fault. You call us with excuses to know all sorts of things (how much we get paid, who works in another department, what the name of the boss is, etc...); you change your name to be anonymous, you lower down our salary expectations when we are about to get a new job, but if we do not want to change firm you tell us how big the bonuses at other firms have been compared to ours. And I can keep going...

  • th
    the City
    10 December 2007

    To Anon, Sales & Marketing;

    What a narrow minded comment-you most likely are the type of person who has had a bad experience in that headhunters ignored you probably because your not very good at what you do! Dont vent your anger on them your just not profit material.

  • ao
    aon
    9 December 2007

    No sleep to be lost- the rare few exceptionally organised and diligent headhunters who I hope go through this unscathed- to the majority which are not worth their salaries- good riddance.

  • Te
    Terence Butler
    7 December 2007

    Karagoz...why should a headhunter not need a rec2rec? Should he know every headhunting company inside out?? How incompetent are some people....

  • ka
    karagoz
    7 December 2007

    Corrections and market downturns are a perfect opportunity to sort out the bad from the good. So many incompetents on the market at the moment giving headhunters a bad name. Oh and a good headhunter should not need a rec2rec ...

Sign up to Morning Coffee!

Coffee mug

The essential daily roundup of news and analysis read by everyone from senior bankers and traders to new recruits.

Sign up to Morning Coffee!

Coffee mug

The essential daily roundup of news and analysis read by everyone from senior bankers and traders to new recruits.