Discover your dream Career
For Recruiters

Sitting pretty at Citi?

Call it what you like, Citi (formerly Citigroup) is doing well. Does that make it a good place to work? Not everyone's convinced.

Last week the Financial Times ran a eulogy to Citi, pointing out that the world's biggest bank is now a force to be reckoned with from M&A through to corporate finance. This week, Financial News is on similarly flattering form, claiming the bank has "proved itself," "fine-tuned the use of its balance sheet" and employs "an increasingly impressive team of investment bankers."

With profits up nearly 50% in the first half iof 2007 and Citi ranking number two in the global M&A league tables this year according to Dealogic, there's little denying that the bank has broken out of the debt mould to become a big beast in M&A. But headhunters say there are still plenty of reasons to steer clear.

"Citi might look healthier according the league tables, but I don't sense any increase in happiness or stability there," says an M&A search consultant. "It's a huge machine run out of the US - which is fine in the current environment, but when the downturn comes it's stuck with a huge cost-base."

In fairness, Citi's already dealing with the bloat - one London derivatives headhunter says the bank is offering voluntary redundancies as part of its effort to cut 17,500 jobs globally. But he says there's still plenty of dead wood and gaps to be filled: "They've got a phenomenal ABS business, but despite hiring Michael Raynes last year as global head of structured credit, they are still weak across credit and rates. If you want an easy life working in a bottom tier-one firm, Citi is the place to go," he adds. "But if you're young and hungry, you're better off elsewhere."

Jonathan Baines, chairman of search firm Whitehead Mann, and a client of Citi, is one of the fans, however. "They're one of the success stories - if not the success story - of recent years," he says. "They are the organisation that has made universal banking work. Ten years ago if you'd asked me to identify the world-class bankers at Citi in Europe I could probably have counted them on one hand - now they are right up there with the very best of the investment banks."

Financial News points out that the eulogising may not last. Citi owes a large part of its recent increase in profits to principal transactions (prop trading) - no matter how many times it changes its name, it may prove hard to maintain that level of income if markets turn.

author-card-avatar
AUTHORAnonymous Insider Comment
  • An
    Anonymous
    13 August 2007

    Dynamic leadership, leads by example and charisma and not by force. In the current environment of Citi, it is fear, bullying, mediocrity, bureaucracy, and a lack of empowerment of us, the staff, that reigns.

    The problem here is that we will inevetably throw out the baby with the bathwater. A real opportunity to have us, scale the enterprise to serve the customer, and stockholder with inovative customer focus, and demonstrate a new form of financial managment, will slip away as the parts get actioned off because Mr. Prince a)leaves too late, b) the firm is incapable of internally finding true leadership to manage the hulking ship all but scuttled by years of mediocrity, where those of us who could left c) the simple locked in value of the parts is worth so much more then the whole that the board, in fact would be acting inapropreatly not to split it up and realize its current market value as a set of business components.

  • Al
    Al
    6 August 2007

    too many fiefdoms was a big problem. v. mediocre management with a job for life attitude. how many ex-citi senior management do you see cutting the mustard at other banks ? not many.

  • ci
    citibanker5
    31 July 2007

    many people care...it's only one of the biggest corporates in the world!

  • An
    Anonymous
    29 July 2007

    who cares?

  • Ci
    Citigroup survivor
    27 July 2007

    Its amazing how many people think the problem started when Sandy Weill left. He was a consummate deal maker but a very poor leader, particularly of something of Citi's size and scope. He didn't really understand the business beyond the US and let the place run of control with the mantra to do anything necessary to beat qtly #s. It's no surprise he had to appoint the corporate lawyer to clean up after him.

Sign up to Morning Coffee!

Coffee mug

The essential daily roundup of news and analysis read by everyone from senior bankers and traders to new recruits.

Sign up to Morning Coffee!

Coffee mug

The essential daily roundup of news and analysis read by everyone from senior bankers and traders to new recruits.