Discover your dream Career
For Recruiters

How CFA Candidate Eligibility Rules Evolved

The CFA Institute clarifies eligibility requirements as part of our discussion on the relative value of MBAs and CFAs.

Our April 18 story, "CFA or MBA: Which Is Right for You?", generated much debate among our readers. While a handful contend the CFA has lost its shine in recent years, one anonymous poster was much more specific in his criticism, asserting that the quality of candidates entering the program has dropped significantly, due to what he said were relaxed entrance requirements. "I feel the CFA designation is not as important as it used to be ever since the CFA Institute eased the requirements to sit" for the required three exams, he wrote.

We relayed his comment to the CFA Institute. Their response, which is run in its entirety below, indicates that while conditions for becoming a candidate were indeed relaxed after the program's inception during the 1960s, the key change - eliminating the requirement that candidates already be employed in the industry before they can take any of the exams - occurred before 1990, or more than 17 years ago.

In fact, the most recent change toughened the requirements for becoming a CFA charter holder. Starting in 2005, the minimum amount of qualifying work experience was bumped up to four years from three. The definition of qualifying work was tightened as well.

The CFA exams themselves, and the program's underlying curriculum, have been updated at regular intervals to reflect changing industry practice.

According to the CFA Institute, here is how the requirements for candidates have evolved:

In the beginning, a candidate was required to submit three references at the time of application and:

HAVE ACCRUED 36 months of eligible work experience at the time of application. This ensured that all candidates were eligible for the award of the charter at the time they passed Level III.

This was changed to:

ACCRUING eligible work experience at the time of application. This pretty much ensured that all candidates were eligible for the award of the charter at the time they passed Level III, unless they experienced a break in service.

This was changed to:

Work experience accrual was not required at the time of application but had to be met before the award of the charter. We found that many candidates wanted to make themselves marketable to employers of charterholders by demonstrating participation in the CFA Program, thus increasing the likelihood that they could get jobs that would allow them to accrue experience.

The next change was:

References are required and eligibility is reviewed as part of the Level III application process (this happened in the 1990s). We found we were spending a lot of time processing references reviewing eligibility for candidates who did not progress past Level I. It was a resource management initiative.

In 2003 the sponsor and work experience requirements changed (two sponsors, 48 months of eligibility). Both are now collected as part of the membership application process, not part of the candidacy process. They can occur at any time after a candidate passes Level I.

So, registration in the CFA Program and membership with CFA Institute have changed over time as one might expect. The exam has grown exponentially not only in terms of the number of candidates but also with regards to its recognition and value around the world. These changes are reflective of CFA candidates' needs to participate in the program and become charter holders, the increasing demand to employ CFA charter holders, and the organization's needs to manage resources.

Add your comments to our original story here, or post your thoughts below.

AUTHORAnonymous Insider Comment
  • Se
    Seye-Olowoyo Mayokun
    1 February 2010

    Whatever makes a smart school graduate or even a violin teacher dedicate himself/herself to this highly rigorous and excruciating experience of studying for all three levels of CFA and passing should be enough to prove to more Senior CFAs that such individuals must indeed be dedicated.I met a CFA level 2 candidate who claimed to have read 17hours daily.what do you call that?DEDICATION!Except we do not want to be honest with ourselves, i believe these are even the core values that the CFA Institute itself looks out for in practicing proffessionals.Pls be objective and welcome dedicated ,aspiring CFAs.

  • cf
    12 November 2007

    The very guys who study about monopoly and quotas and tout capitalism now whine that junior professionals are competing with them. If a dedicated Violin teacher or a smart College Grad can complete CFA, so be it- it is still a difficult exam and needs dedication which all CFA charter holders should be proud of.

  • An
    17 October 2007

    it was very good i reakon but have u got better storys?

  • ee
    20 September 2007

    Can someone write the CFA exam by sitting at home without any work expereince and later on gain the work expereince?

  • aa
    10 September 2007

    cfa is a very reccomded course as for the commerce student in this the new era. but the entrance should be little easier than it helds

Sign up to our Newsletter!

Get advice to help you manage and drive your career.

Boost your career

Find thousands of job opportunities by signing up to eFinancialCareers today.
Latest Jobs
Bonhill Partners
Front Office Developer
Bonhill Partners
New York, United States
Cash Management Sales, Americas
New York, United States
Vice President- FX Strategy Research
New York, United States

Sign up to our Newsletter!

Get advice to help you manage and drive your career.