Discover your dream Career
For Recruiters

New Star a bonus-free zone

Fund managers, according to one report, at John Duffield's newly floated New Star Asset Management are not being paid bonuses. A good idea?

Not only are the end of year-extras non-existent at New Star, The Financial Times says salaries at the fund management group are also low, begging the question why anyone would choose to work there.

Headhunters say the compensation scheme at New Star is unusual, and perhaps ill-advised: "In terms of total compensation, people at New Star are paid on a comparable basis to others in the industry," says Kim Yates, director of the asset management division at executive search firm Principal Search. The crucial difference, says Yates, is that New Star's hot managers are paid hefty salaries to compensate for their absent bonuses, an arrangement at odds with industry norms.

Yates says normal base salaries are rarely higher than $150,000, with standard bonuses doubling that figure. New Star managers could therefore be on salaries in the neighborhood of 300,000.

Yates describes it as 'absolutely extraordinary.' "Most fund managers are seeking to make pay much more performance driven," she says. "But New Star's [pay] model assumes that they're employing the best people who will always deliver the best for the business. And they will be rewarded even if they don't!"

Would you work without a bonus if your salary were high enough? Should other firms follow suit?

Let us know what you think.

We will add your comment below. Please tell us if you would like to remain anonymous.

author-card-avatar
AUTHORAnonymous Insider Comment
  • Ia
    Ian
    16 November 2005

    From an employee's point of view a large base salary is great, particular if you are better at interviews than you are at your job. Through a process of self selection, New Star will eventually be a destination job for those managers who feel as though they have lost their magic touch. The fixed costs of the business will balloon though, and a bad year will lead to cost cutting. Unfortunatley for the firm, redundancy payments are not going to be trivial anymore.

    Name and address supplied

  • Ia
    Ian
    16 November 2005

    Can it work? Definitely. Will it catch on? Probably not. Bonuses are a cheat for several obvious reasons. Firstly, they are about individual performance when all organizations rely on, and make great claims of relying on, teamwork. It is impossible to reconcile the two, even if "teamwork" is supposedly included in the criteria for the bonus. Secondly, the bonus is not solely influenced by individual performance anyway (even if that could be measured accurately) since the bonus pool is dependent on the firms' overall performance. So no matter how good your individual performance, if some other department makes a mess-up, you won't get much bonus. Thirdly, the bonus is a useful instrument of control for employers, since they are not obliged to pay it. It can be cut or withdrawn at will - very useful from the company's point of view. This is why the bonus will remain, even though from an employee's point of view a pound of base salary is far better than a pound of bonus.

    Name and address supplied

Sign up to Morning Coffee!

Coffee mug

The essential daily roundup of news and analysis read by everyone from senior bankers and traders to new recruits.

Sign up to Morning Coffee!

Coffee mug

The essential daily roundup of news and analysis read by everyone from senior bankers and traders to new recruits.